I play both right side up and upside down. I have no trouble overblowing
either way. I cannot make Neil's method work for me, however. I also am
confused as to whether a teaching method can be copyrighted. I do have a
copyright on my book, but I think that's just so no one can reprint the
book and sell it under their own authoriship. The concepts are
everybody's, it's is my language I am copyrighting. Or can you copyright a
technique?
Michael Rubin
michaelrubinharmonica.com
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Brian Irving <brian.irving@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Playing "upside down" should not make any difference, other than
reversing
the direction of the air flow (to the appropriate side of the hole) to
achieve overblows, if that technique is, indeed as effective as claimed.
I've played "upside down" from day 1 and I manage to bash out a tune or
two, incorporating all traditional blow and draw bends and octave splits
as
necessary, without getting thrown out of any bars (or bands!).
B
-----Original Message-----
From: harp-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:harp-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Harmonicology [Neil Ashby]
Sent: 02 November 2014 19:36
To: harp-l
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] The Ashby Method for Overbending
(1) Below is among the comments I received that was not "cc:" to Harp-L:
"That's amazing. I've been playing for 55 years and the one technique
that has baffled me, despite various suggestions from my customizers is
the
overblow.
I tried this and had instant gratification. Many thanks.
"
(2) Pertaining "playing the harp numbers down" then I consider that to be
a non-standard embouchure and would not bother to comment. Somebody on
YouTube performs with the harp backward in his mouth and selects the
notes
via covering holes with his fingers; that is another non-standard
embouchure and he ought even not consider overbends.
/Neil