[Harp-L] Re: Harp-L Chromatic vs Diatonic
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: Harp-L Chromatic vs Diatonic
- From: Chris Bauer <jazzharp1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1278438264; bh=Ffb6NXEmN0DS3VqaDVPylLC7XqpnRJMETOaa7Ybokt4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=2/8faqPfbTbT/4rgzSxFSaCoX/GgJYMswJypxJzzgh7gHxYWcKD7YMnfxapQZi0/i5Fpb5Stl8RiNmgFlnpdhgEppJEJSjTtSCjkFYfgndPSGoPzLlj4sy0MwR08dGHS0xfnJLMLcdEhU/gZlS2Jwa4IflK0XMBYzt0A/ZwRG1s=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=u0f+MFVX28G4sDruMTJpj2GXU7UFTFgDdGsbxgI4QaA0l9o/YQNRuNXaBhEZRK6nZQkbIQBau4XfMjDVw1Fo1NvkWgkCES3LMkwL0tZ9sGxzp9XbzAeEZGfK6xsHFCCJQVLKYfeuwjIcqPQORXvihVwE3+IUUijQHNQJl38Tngk=;
- In-reply-to: <201007052025.o65KPfgw002117@harp-l.com>
- References: <201007052025.o65KPfgw002117@harp-l.com>
Well said Robert!
At last years Garden State Harmonica Festival, I attended Rob Paparozzi's seminar, and he addressed this question before anyone asked him. He said people ask him if he's a blues harp player, a diatonic player, or a chromatic player. His answer is "I'm a harmonica player!" Being a 40 year chromatic only player that played diatonics for ONE song (Orange Blossom Special), I was deeply affected by Rob's statement. Since then, I have become a student of diatonics, and have started playing with R&B bands, performed in a local production of "Big River", and now have begun experimenting with diatonics in jazz music. The techniques for chromatic and diatonic are very different, and I feel like I have started to learn a whole new instrument!
Could a chromatic be used in country music? Sure. Would it by stylistically correct? Maybe not. It's kinda like going to a drummer that has played trap set his entire life and ask him if he can play latin percussion. Could he play latin percussion on a trap set? Sure. Would it be stylistically correct? Maybe not.
So, in the end...it's a harmonica--diatonic or chromatic.
Subject: [Harp-L] chromatic vs diatonic
To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <E2FF0E0F-BC11-46A7-9BEF-A16C034D57AF@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
I love both instruments, but I tend to go for the easy way technically
in order to get to the musical feeling quicker. This means when it
comes to folk, blues and country I tend to go with the diatonic and
for melodies, jazz, classical I go to the chromatic.
One of the big advantages of playing the chromatic in a melodic
situation is to SAVE TIME in that you don't have to figure out how to
play the tune - no positions, choice of harps, bends or overblows,
just play. I can read down 50 tunes in an afternoon and be working on
expression right away - this way I can choose which tune sounds the
best to include in repertoire without spending much time on the tune.
I also can figure out which tunes might sound better on the diatonic.
Players should learn both just for the fun of it. Even Stevie, Toots,
and Galison can play diatonic; Musselwhite, Jellyroll, Singer, Turk,
Pararozzi, Hoover, DePino all play chromatic. Lots of people
crossover and end up wih a choice.
Both are harmonicas!
Harmonically yours,
Robert Bonfiglio
http://www.robertbonfiglio.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.