Re: [Harp-L] Harp L: Chromatic versus Diatonic
- To: Paul Routledge <paulandrewroutledge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Harp L: Chromatic versus Diatonic
- From: michael rubin <michaelrubinharmonica@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 10:22:52 -0500
- Cc: Harp L L <Harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AvkwheheOKp0KFqodPOrUy0Lsf2FQQFBQElSkHHBzJE=; b=TiyMMKn+j+5uxVlb2NyPb6pvt8xEFpmXNM801abAwoLfAd/PuFZEXIMq/ej03xfH3g fZyOzVd4FiFPfh5XjX0ypvnuBP5YyzsX9Wutkqod7ro83Se6qzbJ5vXDpN6EhkJjTGE7 7BL9WTiH6/SED5jYLfdrFispB0Mqtw9O3lusA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IZbOs0J1rbpkD+u5S7j/fIkrHJV/dFUJ3hac0m0nomkVYqcVED708MySb36iSgIpSk F/PaJmVQzKpl+I8r8GQOd1B/WcWDbwGJ5QG6ZM8OsmS8C2i3djX6bqMzkO1Ja2C+q0D3 3kDk0edMQZ1Lx9z2WfNWSKpww2cr8EpsqwY2g=
- In-reply-to: <A7212F37-8967-42B1-9E0C-77220020D940@gmail.com>
- References: <A7212F37-8967-42B1-9E0C-77220020D940@gmail.com>
When I want the sound of the chromatic, I play chromatic. When I
want the sound of the diatonic and I want to be able to play notes
that need overblows, I play diatonic with overblows. Hopefully, that
explains it.
I will say there are some diatonic players who prefer not only equal
tuned harps, but either equal tuned or compromised just tuned harps
that they have retuned in such a way that to me it sounds more like a
chromatic than a diatonic. However, there are elements that remain
distinctly diatonic. I would place Chris Michalek in this category.
Perhaps these are the players you are wondering about. Perhaps one
of them would speak up. I am glad PT Gazell said what he did about
his use of valved bends.
Michael Rubin
Michaelrubinharmonica.com
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Paul Routledge
<paulandrewroutledge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I posted the message below in a thread over on the MBH forum and thought it
> might be a good topic to explore here.
>
> I'm not personally a great fan of overblows as I have stated on previous
> occasions. However I do think that they have a place in music. It's just my
> preference not to use them.
>
> I can see why some people like using them in a blues context, but when it
> comes to playing jazz, classical, pop, etc and wishing to play
> chromatically. I can't see why people wouldn't just choose to use a
> chromatic harmonica instead. The tonality exhibited by most people playing
> chromatically on a diatonic in genres outside of blues (and maybe country
> music) is so close to the chromatic, that I honestly don't see any real
> tangible benefits in using it.
>
> For example if you listen to the audio clip that Chris Michalek posted. It
> is extremely good playing as usual by Chris, although it's overall tonality
> owes more to the chromatic work of Stevie Wonder and Toots than anything
> else. So I just can't see why it wouldn't be better to use the chromatic.
>
> The clip by Chris can be found about halfway down this page:
> http://www.modernbluesharmonica.com/board/board_topic/5560960/607263.htm?page=1
>
> I'd be interested in hearing the reasons for and against choosing to use a
> diatonic played chromatically over the chromatic harmonica, when playing in
> genres outside of blues.
>
>
> Paul
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.