Re: [Harp-L] Re: TB or pucker - or a bit of both
Those that you mention really spent a lot of dedicated time to this
endeavor. Most blues players won't.
The biggest mistake I hear from the level B players getting into OB is that
they use, for example, 6 OB not so much to create an interesting line, but
more to show that they can do a 6 OB.
In a message dated 1/19/2009 8:16:33 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
bill.eborn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
"It's because the overblows are reedy thin in tone and approximate in
pitch."
...only if you don't practice hard enough, one of things I had to learn when
I started using OBs was to restrain myself from overusing the 6ob because I
loved the sound of it so much and to try and achieve a consistent tone no
matter how you achieve the note.
Howard Levy, Carlos Del Junco, Sebastien Charlier, I can't hear much
thinness and reediness there myself.....
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Drew W" <eviltweed@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 8:58 AM
Subject: [Harp-L] Re: TB or pucker - or a bit of both
> Well I think it does, and Wilson thinks it does. On the other hand, I just
> listened to Rick Estrin on that three-way chat say he thinks there's no
> difference, though he also makes subtle adjustments in each technique to
> mimic the other.
>
> But he also contradicts that by saying something I totally agree with -
> that
> you get a sweet sound with a pucker and a sound that resonates through
> your
> whole body with a TB. So, he thinks there's a difference, but also thinks
> there isn't. What are we to think if he can't decide?
>
> What I think (and what I wrote) is that MOST of the time you can tell when
> a
> guy is puckering or TB-ing, but not 100% of the time. I think you get a
> deeper fatter sound when you pucker the 2 draw than if you TB. I've heard
> guys do it both ways and I'm yet to change my mind.
>
> As to your own experiments: we'll never know because we weren't there and
> frankly I don't know how you play and where your at or anything. What I do
> know is my Little Walter, Kim Wilson, Big Walter, Steve Guyger and other
> CDs
> that I have listened to a million times... so I'll just keep working that
> groove and trying to figure out why LW sounds like he did it this way one
> time and that way another.
>
> Because it's fun. Y'know?
>
> Anyway, this will never be something we can reach consensus on. It's like
> overblowers wondering why the legendary blues cats don't overblow. It's
> because the overblows are reedy thin in tone and approximate in pitch. But
> you'll never convince their advocates that that is true!
>
> (Ducks for cover)
>
>
> It does? Funny, it doesn't when I play it. I think this gets to my
>> point that often people make assumptions from their own playing and
>> generalize it for when they listen to old records. Which is a
>> natural thing to do.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
> Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
steps!
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=De
cemailfooterNO62)
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.