Re: [Harp-L] overblows vs half valving
- To: Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] overblows vs half valving
- From: Zombor Kovacs <zrkovacs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:50:47 -0800 (PST)
- Cc:
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Q3XSzM+ONAXm7pGvl8oMrdP+1//G7OS+OCqJQQ8AKieStvImwrm6uo9JwRvMNmSPJpDMDBuwAA7Nd3iTVvUW65bEW+XF1YvzcGvELXFQV2PfuhyqI9QtzzpmuxrIGa97VytYrdw3t3fhy5yzbWjTRshIXhdSKLQBcIWPukuwIE4=;
- In-reply-to: <fn29on+4e3v@eGroups.com>
Okay. So you say, that overblowing is more popular
than playing valved diatonics because first of all
Howard Levy, then Jason Ricci and P.T. Gazell is
playing overblows. Okay. This means that the only
reason is, that there are some great players, who are
already using this technique, and it creates
popularity. Then
somebody must master the same thing on valved
diatonics, and it will be equally popular. Or?
--- Tim Moyer <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jon Clark wrote (on overblows vs half-valving):
> > Listen to Jason and ask no more.
>
> Or listen to P.T. Gazell for an equally convincing
> counterargument...
>
> -tim
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
> Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.