Re: [Harp-L] Studio Reverb / which type to use?
- To: Tim Moyer <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Studio Reverb / which type to use?
- From: Robert Paparozzi <chromboy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:09:04 -0400
- Cc:
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=sWOYjU4P9f+yEiinPhrLK/BZIEmZUugXRAq8+gGGcKfq1dpFcwvMSvJ5+srBbP+q; h=Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- In-reply-to: <euh98l+7e4r@eGroups.com>
- Thread-index: AcdyaAIOQMJtFt5bEdud4QAX8shj6w==
- Thread-topic: [Harp-L] Studio Reverb / which type to use?
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214
I think it's better to play your solo with some reverb to play it dry you
won't get the 'nuance' on your ornamentions etc...Tim, isn't there a way to
use the verb in the software just for the 'cue' mix but not to record?
Then add all the fancy Reverb efx later??
Best,rob
On 3/29/07 4:57 PM, "Tim Moyer" <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> A quick question to all who records in studio. I'm gonna record
>> chromatic solo. Which type of Lexicon reverb would be the most
>> applicable: plate, vocal, hall, etc. It' s gonna be a front man
>> solo - no echo like things at backgound, but solo with a jazz
> band.
>> I'll try a couple in studio, but in ordrer to save time in studio
>> your advice would help greatly.
>
> I agree with Richard that if you can lay your solo down "dry" on a
> separate track you can add the reverb (and other effects) in the mix
> down and tailor it to the rest of the piece. This also has the
> advantage of allowing you to dial in how "wet" the effect is. When
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.