RE: [Harp-L] acoustic harp.

[Buck Worley <boogalloo@xxxxxxx>]

I think Richard has a FX patch for the toe thing. Seriously how many bluegrass players do you see carrying amps... most I've been around utilize a PA for sound reinforcement but I consider that to be acoustic ... imho

Subject: Re: [Harp-L] acoustic harp.
From: mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:06:07 -0400
CC: 3n037@xxxxxxxxxxx; harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
To: boogalloo@xxxxxxx

Hands, Ears, Nose, Lips, Tongue......all are acoustic, Toes would be considered effects.

Mike Wilbur

On Sep 19, 2014, at 1:30 PM, Buck Worley <boogalloo@xxxxxxx> wrote:




What? No hands?

> Subject: Re: [Harp-L] acoustic harp.
> From: mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:59:14 -0400
> To: 3n037@xxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Smo-Joe
> Good question as I have heard several different definition's, my definition world be
> With or without amplification but .....without any other effects.
> JMHO
> 
> 
> Mike Wilbur
> 
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Joseph Leone <3n037@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >> I would seriously like to know exactly what acoustic harp IS? Is it undistorted? Unamplified? Or is it a matter of playing through a pa without additional effects? OR no pa at all?
> > Or no amplifier at all? Or just playing out into the atmosphere in the general area surrounding the player? Any takers? 
> > 
> > smo-joe
> > 
> > 
> > 
>