RE: [Harp-L] Breaking in a new harp
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [Harp-L] Breaking in a new harp
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 21:11:24 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=jZYK99awuQMEA5ZW9ONc6zfJ3bFmIZnNUhDamaEQP0H0PHpxBZDFcJgb6x9/5eFX; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Steve <moorcot@xxxxxxx> wrote:
<...last year I bought two Seydel Session Steels and neither of them went past an hour's playing before a reed went totally south (and with other reeds <drifting out of tune). They are not the most expensive harps in the world but any harp that lasts an hour or less is astronomically expensive. Find out <what *lots* of people have to say about any harp before you invest is my advice.
Good advice, of course. My experience has obviously been different from yours.
Regards, Richard Hunter
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.