[Harp-L] Re: Harp-L Digest, Vol 133, Issue 21
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: Harp-L Digest, Vol 133, Issue 21
- From: patpowers <patpowers@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:58:13 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <201409191728.s8JHS4gL024403@harp-l.com>
- References: <201409191728.s8JHS4gL024403@harp-l.com>
- Thread-index: ZN1GuPLRoFZL7Dpbfp6GDVd5UModOg==
- Thread-topic: Harp-L Digest, Vol 133, Issue 21
I guess that could be considered an "acoustic" Wah? ...and if you could cup the harp with your feet (and play it), would that be considered an "acoustic Wah-Wah pedal???" ...LOL
----- Original Message -----
From: Buck Worley <boogalloo@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Harp-L] acoustic harp.
To: Mike Wilbur <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joseph Leone
Cc: Harp L Harp L <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
What? No hands?
> Subject: Re: [Harp-L] acoustic harp.
> From: mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:59:14 -0400
> To: 3n037@xxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
> Good question as I have heard several different definition's, my definition world be
> With or without amplification but .....without any other effects.
> Mike Wilbur
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Joseph Leone <3n037@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> I would seriously like to know exactly what acoustic harp IS? Is it undistorted? Unamplified? Or is it a matter of playing through a pa without additional effects? OR no pa at all?
> > Or no amplifier at all? Or just playing out into the atmosphere in the general area surrounding the player? Any takers?
> > smo-joe
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and