Re: [Harp-L] Re: upbend
- To: Christopher Sprankle <crsprankle@xxxxxxxxx>, "harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx" <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re: upbend
- From: Dennis Michael Montgomery <gaulay2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:59:35 -0800 (PST)
- Cc:
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1392332375; bh=/F7Eoouz0BwnJLifeRic1yZQ1sA+ywvSJVhZAbLTtf0=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nQvxlcG92ODHiOCZUQiHTrKPzxGiDbxQlB1da1uPLdV0RXI6EYJXsGrfD4yuGLk9oVlwBXvqrbFIrkbPHf8dzUc9ElBd5Fo3vVSRKbnkuYAuwqEpnH/qKSqdJWbCm5GGcXVf/KJvRusPeIrdsKGRExMJr2TqdhSNYrB+9mpdesA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gvDVqGVu3kox47HHAXll8Ermh4tozhimXvZ8hzxvChv7UBC+LzJ0i+UKFE3ZHfyrnb42G8BlOJf9zxFcpvbnSUDMfYPnckMLLuMOz0iPIYtPeKaU6twfgG8Q4tKgSNeiaJ/n8mYY25qoKGh+0t80wEnQwNcIxEqhz4xpWy4vOOs=;
- In-reply-to: <1392302916.12651.YahooMailNeo@web140703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
- References: <d54df.15539439.402d693a@aol.com> <1392302878.86403.YahooMailNeo@web140705.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1392302916.12651.YahooMailNeo@web140703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: Dennis Michael Montgomery <gaulay2@xxxxxxxxx>
I like the term "upbend". It makes more sense. The other terminology has always been confusing to me.
Now, if only I could learn to do it.
Dennis
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 7:54 AM, Christopher Sprankle <crsprankle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's too late to change it. People have been calling them overblows for 25+ years, and I doubt it will ever change. When I was a beginner back in the late 90s, overblows seemed like some kind of rocket science that I would never understand or even care about. It might be better to keep it that way. Beginners/intermediates need to concentrate on getting all the low end bends and worry about overblows lately. Most of the local "professional "players I know can't even play "Happy Birthday" on the low end in cross harp.
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 7:53 AM, "BluzeHarp@xxxxxxx" <BluzeHarp@xxxxxxx> wrote:
The terms overblow overdraw and overbend are very confusing for many
beginner and even intermediate level players, a quick dig into the archives is
all that's needed to confirm this. I proposed upbend as a way for the name
of the technique to more closely describe what the technique actually
accomplishes... bending the pitch of a played note upward.
Sure, the reeds are doing stuff that could cause you to make the argument
noted below, but the issue at hand is the confusion created by the current
terminology. The goal wasn't to present a scientifically precise
description of what happens beneath the cover plates, but instead to create a term
that would more clearly describe the end result of the upbend technique...
something a beginner could make some sense of.
Michael Ruben (who teaches a lot of players) independently proposed
'ascended bend', which is the same thing with a couple extra syllables.
Michael's hoitytoidyness aside, I guess there's at least two of us who see the
current terminology as needing repair. In any case if you say them backwards
I'd much rather be asked to bend up than to bend over.
If there's a still better description floating around that gets the point
across I'd be all in.
Christopher Richards
Harmonicaplanet.com
In a message dated 2/11/2014 7:42:12 A.M. Mountain Standard Time,
harp-l-request@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
All full bends are 'up' bends.When you draw hole one down to C# on a C
harp, you are playing the blow reed in reverse, exactly the same as an
'overbend'. The C reed plays in reverse as C#. Only the partial bends could
be called 'down' ie Bb or A at draw 3 on a C harp.
So, no, sorry, I wouldn't adopt that term.
RD
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.