Re: [Harp-L] Re: upbend
- To: Christopher Richards <BluzeHarp@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re: upbend
- From: Michael Rubin <michaelrubinharmonica@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:50:17 -0600
- Cc: harp-l <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JuV3M0+YBUJGyIchQhLH63YYQREJAXkGogWjXNz0wLQ=; b=ppVwgalFiF/HVHirs5cVRRDMSt9ut2OjTfrjuxcgSIwJTwLjchWI3v4yYO38XbDb+e ZYW7XnJv/w6EdoG0IeEqC225em6zQVHAjwUsDQ1VfimWoReb7rEpdcaigYivc3Fa1czW ronSJKMA0KAH2roIjBAVZysjq9dPcLosHqSgh3Fk6AyqUyrnX/zOUsqQyM4t9vGXm32Y BspSBf2sctd4b+K8TP49atWmGja6XK7bN3AwlYrqZzavTty4GM8nbFn12rsBfcwn3riJ jkizqVsLx0lR/HheYcll7hdNmeyPe8BkTTtGT2EdcLDLOBgrspIXFcP0n63BbIJOEy7o 1G6Q==
- In-reply-to: <d54df.15539439.402d693a@aol.com>
- References: <d54df.15539439.402d693a@aol.com>
Hoity-toityness? You're going down! ;)
Michael Rubin
Michaelrubinharmonica.com
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:18 PM, <BluzeHarp@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> The terms overblow overdraw and overbend are very confusing for many
> beginner and even intermediate level players, a quick dig into the
> archives is
> all that's needed to confirm this. I proposed upbend as a way for the
> name
> of the technique to more closely describe what the technique actually
> accomplishes... bending the pitch of a played note upward.
>
> Sure, the reeds are doing stuff that could cause you to make the argument
> noted below, but the issue at hand is the confusion created by the current
> terminology. The goal wasn't to present a scientifically precise
> description of what happens beneath the cover plates, but instead to
> create a term
> that would more clearly describe the end result of the upbend technique...
> something a beginner could make some sense of.
>
> Michael Ruben (who teaches a lot of players) independently proposed
> 'ascended bend', which is the same thing with a couple extra syllables.
> Michael's hoitytoidyness aside, I guess there's at least two of us who
> see the
> current terminology as needing repair. In any case if you say them
> backwards
> I'd much rather be asked to bend up than to bend over.
>
> If there's a still better description floating around that gets the point
> across I'd be all in.
>
> Christopher Richards
> Harmonicaplanet.com
>
>
> In a message dated 2/11/2014 7:42:12 A.M. Mountain Standard Time,
> harp-l-request@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> All full bends are 'up' bends.When you draw hole one down to C# on a C
> harp, you are playing the blow reed in reverse, exactly the same as an
> 'overbend'. The C reed plays in reverse as C#. Only the partial bends
> could
> be called 'down' ie Bb or A at draw 3 on a C harp.
> So, no, sorry, I wouldn't adopt that term.
> RD
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.