Re: [Harp-L] Seydel Session Steel
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Seydel Session Steel
- From: Boris Plotnikov <ploboris@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 10:59:02 +0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gWGnH3WSSB8UUGpIUOGs3dsvWD2I6Vt4YY/TIHrZT3k=; b=Ced2fsJsqSOQSvcf1E/HVj7W0A1h5kqTnoJdWhMQ9mrzMBwgS2/AzyKCMLcakXcH5u lFtK0PL4xWCDjFNgrAIhmM9aztbIgHBEzvmVun1K3Ma7XELvmCMe9uOgxyJGqOls/TkQ 4sna9VKJgZp8LjlImvZhJowMuKYe88eDxP0Y5Uu7zfLHjwYPO5bi+whnTM/6t6V0YyTS wfcVfGSfxqiOLVU1ZB2X5Az6c/cRLXTlvlFjsF6Gvan3l0OphNjmYC4DquGAa6JlzzTO KZeLbpVsZNgFz/+PF6qJEw9N0Bn26Ul2eLASQ/1p6VggjBjTVvVxJDZa9E6bqEXikGNz KiTw==
- In-reply-to: <12BB308E-8145-43AC-9D12-DF3F4B175031@comcast.net>
- References: <527EF457.6020407@tektel.com.au> <12BB308E-8145-43AC-9D12-DF3F4B175031@comcast.net>
I'm think if man ruins session steel reeds, brass reeds will not live
enough long.
2013/11/10 Ross Macdonald <pdxharpdog@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> I second Tonys thunderbird recommendation. These harps are bright and
> durable. I currently have low D, G, A, E flat and low E flat in my case and
> I'm a very happy thunderbird customer.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 9, 2013, at 6:49 PM, Tony Eyers <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Certainly the Hohner Thunderbirds are more expensive than other premium
> models. Small sales volumes, compared to other Hohner models would account
> for this in part.
> >
> > However I'm glad that Hohner have stuck their neck out, engaged arguably
> the world's finest customiser (Joe Filisko) to help with the design, and
> created an instrument meant for low reeds, as opposed to other low key
> manufacturuers, who, as far as I can see, simply attach low reeds to their
> regular models, without additional allowances for low key operation.
> >
> > Amongst other things, the Thunderbird cover plates accommodate the wider
> travel of low reeds, thereby eliminating the clunk common to the bottom
> reeds of low key harmonicas.
> >
> > Steve: in your case you'd just need one Thunderbird, a low D. Regular
> harmonicas would cover the other keys, as they have no doubt done so far.
> So, the extra cost, while significant, would extend to one harmonica only.
> >
> > There is the wider question of how much should one spend on harmonicas.
> I mix with bluegrass players mostly, and am lucky to be amongst some very
> good ones. None of them play instruments costing less than $3000, the money
> spent is reflected in the great sound they make. I think the same way about
> my harmonicas.
> >
> > For the most part my music friends are not wealthy, neither am I.
> However they have invested in tools which allow them to best express the
> music they love.
> >
> > I drive an old (but reliable) car, my other tastes are likewise modest.
> However I've made an exception with harmonicas, and play the best ones I
> can get. In my case, these are Neil Graham custom Hohner diatonics and
> Tombo Premium 21 tremolos (the best, in my view). And Thunderbirds.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
Thanks, Boris Plotnikov
http://borisplotnikov.ru
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.