[Harp-L] Seydel Session Steel
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Seydel Session Steel
- From: Tony Eyers <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 13:49:59 +1100
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
Certainly the Hohner Thunderbirds are more expensive than other premium
models. Small sales volumes, compared to other Hohner models would
account for this in part.
However I'm glad that Hohner have stuck their neck out, engaged arguably
the world's finest customiser (Joe Filisko) to help with the design, and
created an instrument meant for low reeds, as opposed to other low key
manufacturuers, who, as far as I can see, simply attach low reeds to
their regular models, without additional allowances for low key operation.
Amongst other things, the Thunderbird cover plates accommodate the wider
travel of low reeds, thereby eliminating the clunk common to the bottom
reeds of low key harmonicas.
Steve: in your case you'd just need one Thunderbird, a low D. Regular
harmonicas would cover the other keys, as they have no doubt done so
far. So, the extra cost, while significant, would extend to one
harmonica only.
There is the wider question of how much should one spend on harmonicas.
I mix with bluegrass players mostly, and am lucky to be amongst some
very good ones. None of them play instruments costing less than $3000,
the money spent is reflected in the great sound they make. I think the
same way about my harmonicas.
For the most part my music friends are not wealthy, neither am I.
However they have invested in tools which allow them to best express the
music they love.
I drive an old (but reliable) car, my other tastes are likewise modest.
However I've made an exception with harmonicas, and play the best ones I
can get. In my case, these are Neil Graham custom Hohner diatonics and
Tombo Premium 21 tremolos (the best, in my view). And Thunderbirds.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.