[Harp-L] 4th tips
- To: harp-l <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Harp-L] 4th tips
- From: Mick Zaklan <mzaklan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 16:47:11 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hkEM2Vp2evBr7fRB6PXzC1dgdWlC8hQQ6Rjl7gVoD/g=; b=UHi2HXNE3IS+WG5ItDidachKpyHIValOJuHxtCvgJ55L0FLLrNb7Xhuo/jwPlFM9H+ XQWmwnfYoo2FQiOf0QYYN+JwGIKhNjURXKDi3fbkxK+8FEys1YeZms7nLh0bsDbCnGuz NlO5RNElkwhtOugZ/nt60Ou/EyTv1HREjKmkAV64L5S3rBmdiq5uZ4Rhd4ZV/T3LUf9/ yEYEyb6mhdO1Y7LZVzmdI9wud3kD31zasgYmnbKaZK18txmFSqdMb/sS3R3x9Y0B3n0t uGXcikpNBIhkJd8rr2mJUFeBNjegSQjOtxc0WaYKWV2+OkkrdWDwn37j9Mpe6CmkRBX0 +jgQ==
Well Stephen, I almost hate to re-post this. The first time around, one
of our list members was so confused by it that he emailed me offlist:
"Waa....huh....eh....whasthat....umm???"
So I guess my convoluted methodology really confused him. But it's how
I learned it, so here's my original posts. The first one was kind of an
intro to the subject:
http://harp-l.org/pipermail/harp-l/2010-May/msg00011.html.
The second one was actually playing tips, and that's probably where the guy
came to the conclusion I was nuts:
http://harp-l.org/pipermail/harp-l/2010-May/msg00012.html.
Maybe he was right. And it's not a Jimmy Reed sound, though I think there
are some similarities between 1st and 4th.
Mick Zaklan
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.