RE: [Harp-L] When Did Fast Become Good?
Mike Fugazzi nailed it for me. Great job Mike.
Michael Peloquin
510-703-6341
The West Coast Harmonica Summit DVD has been released:
http://www.jazzharmonicasummit.com/
http://www.amazon.com/West-Coast-Jazz-Harmonica-Summit/dp/B003UL1BPY
It was an amazing night of harmonica, and now you can witness it even if you weren’t there! Buy your copy today!
http://harpsax.com
> Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 08:41:38 -0700
> From: mikefugazzi@xxxxxxxxx
> To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Harp-L] When Did Fast Become Good?
> CC: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> If you are someone who plays fast, trying keeping up with some skilled and
> respectable guitar players. I am a huge Derek Trucks fans and a lot of
> what we consider, "fast", is casual on guitar. Derek Trucks is NOT known
> for being a fast or notey player, but if you try to even keep up with some
> of his blues playing, there are a lot of runs that would be hard to keep
> timing with on harmonica.
>
> Three other thoughts:
>
> 1. People don't articulate what they mean well all the time. I *think*
> what is being suggested here is that people dislike players who play fast
> for long stretches without dynamics...meaning there is the issue of too
> many notes. In fact, that might be the core issue and not the actual speed
> as the harmonica is NOT speedy relative to other instruments.
>
> 2. Context is also very important. First of all, we have all heard
> endless and endless traditional blues harmonica playing. Any variance of
> that is something that is going to grab our attention whether it be good or
> bad. Same with the masses. I bet we have all at some point introduced
> ourselves as playing harmonica to others with a caveat..."I play harmonica,
> but not like what you're thinking", is what I say about 99% of the time.
> People either associate harp with blues playing of Bob Dylan playing.
> ANYTHING other than that will sound impressive. Other examples are
> walking around on a wireless, playing a train, playing with no hands, etc.
>
> When watching a live band, they should be creating moments for people.
> Playing fast on a tune or something can be that moment. When 80%+ of what
> American audiences have heard of harmonica essentially takes place over the
> same two chords and 5 holes of the harmonica, people get numb to it.
>
> 3. Not everyone plays blues. Of course, most Western harp players assume
> that, but I am willing to bet from day one, even in the States, the bulk of
> harmonica being played is NOT blues. Play Oh Susanna on the harp. Played
> at the right tempo, that is not a slow or moderate song.
>
> I am not telling people what to like and not like. I am only suggesting
> that making a blanket statement about playing fast is just that. Some
> people may dislike it because of the patterns or note choices, whatever.
> But fast is just as musical as anything else.
>
> Starting out I wanted to play like John Popper. Then I heard Jason Ricci
> and wanted to play like that. Then I heard Chris Michalek and wanted to
> play like that. I spent several years making myself NOT play fast (by fast
> I mean fast...I am not discussing my use of space or how long I jam, etc.).
> During that stage, I didn't play super fast, but I still used tons of
> embellishments. Truth is, I play rock music 3/4 of the time and it makes
> me happy to play really fast and notey sometimes (I tend to leave space and
> not jam for too long nowadays). I stopped fighting it and in the last year
> my playing has gotten a ton better. I am a happy person that likes playing
> the high end of the harp fast sometimes. It sounds joyous and makes me
> feel good. I just play what makes me happy, lol. Truth be told, I find
> myself jamming to other instruments, though, and realizing the harp is just
> not a "fast" instrument and what we consider "notey" and "fast" is less
> fast and notey than horns, keys, and guitar.
>
> Finally, I have never enjoyed head cutting. Trading licks is great, but
> I've seen clips of high profile players just going after each other. While
> I can respect that and understand that I am probably in the minority - the
> musicians and audience love it - it just doesn't move me. The reason for
> this is that it often results in players NOT playing things very musically.
> That doesn't mean it is bad, I just don't go looking to hear that stuff.
> Tying it all together, http://youtu.be/56SHlnUrhuM?t=3m34s. You can go
> back and listen to Warren and Taj takes solos, but Derek's solo has
> dynamics, is sorta notey, very melodic, and fits the groove. Playing that
> on harp would have you compared to guys like Popper and Ricci for the sheer
> notes and speed.
>
> Mike
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.