Re: [Harp-L] home recording
- To: "turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx" <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] home recording
- From: Larry Sandy <slyou65@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 16:42:03 -0800 (PST)
- Cc:
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1386376923; bh=SRyJcsIyJIV0GeS79yYjGSskTbbPYCBoMwLdx5EdDm0=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dELoi1Dmnsh2gPhVoCSdjT22J1v2miu2nRSMgzKG7M373fe7I2pMQsypfoWYmxskDOzM0gseFLNNc9NaKiKIu2ljuZxawU+OCO1vbPtbqbxO9ODyFrdCCJB6xENH1yXaN9hErbVL7nRjTh/FWObyAI4kQ2TmeVI9bHl5CDYKWs4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=w+xlBqbOfo7nrl/8pD/w/HwxuH9CQzie3428dc2QUt1aDGLm8nETMPC9GS3o4DAli5ccuQqkHkUMmpFoEcy6YJWDQfvX9Huwo8P644Y1R+K9QCNCX1atXeEpLawbgK8HenNN9PcC6Nu/hpkNaTRAMmAUpHotfNZDK8qNLHmV/DE=;
- In-reply-to: <16434702.1386375637553.JavaMail.root@elwamui-royal.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Our sound department supervisor recently presented a talk on recording and related topics. He said about 33 bit sampling was enough and that 44 bit samples were superfluous. I'm confused. Maybe he was actually discussing another topic. I understood bit sampling to mean the number of digital samples during one cycle on the waveform monitor. I think most in attendance were lost right after his introduction. Home recording is an interesting topic so please keep it going.<br/><br/>Lockjaw Larry<br/>Breathing Music daily, even when confused.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.