Re: [Harp-L] Low Chromatics
- To: Jp Pagán <jplpagan@xxxxxxx>, "harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx" <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Low Chromatics
- From: Winslow Yerxa <winslowyerxa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc:
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1348427991; bh=6bETUx54Cej0Yxf106pjesMspVQyabK3FY9Bz+2Kmx4=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ie52tUdXRfwILYCyfGVXFsQMQOK10fvPUa8mxJvg4wDJ8Tmq/3IcpJlziIvFkQUQ+DBKmuxXVnQf6Aoo+OmxTFaRA8USxNALfWzuKsn3a3Xt32YY5YyunRLkuyBNLnFDGYiwT598kbrz1AfnwQ/dEiX4qFLFFq77AtUBXxZ+BiM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WTUJ6YQa8E9eG4T6qX5busbyf93tJMzt1pJp8zcVDmjHvG13nz5KlLHt/DxCsZVYvu35BSCPvK6al9ldvpMYMx6xftbyxYd0VC2+Q8oOJksy8sPNu2LVUHifWUa4b/sYDbf+k2KN6nGTu2tRSnxmV30ajaIgSUdWwqPCG/mxC20=;
- In-reply-to: <C9A6C65A-B0FD-4A69-925A-3BA2207C46AC@mac.com>
- References: <C9A6C65A-B0FD-4A69-925A-3BA2207C46AC@mac.com>
- Reply-to: Winslow Yerxa <winslowyerxa@xxxxxxxxx>
It's demand.
Every now and then I've run across pre-war factory Hohner 64s in Bb; I believe Dennis Gruenling owns one. And Frank Huang and Steve Malerbi have both made Low A chromatics for Norton Buffalo by tuning down a C chromatic.
Winslow Yerxa
Author, Harmonica For Dummies, ISBN 978-0-470-33729-5
Harmonica Basics For Dummies, ASIN B005KIYPFS
Blues Harmonica For Dummies, ISBN 978-1-1182-5269-7
Resident Harmonica Expert, bluesharmonica.com
Instructor, Jazzschool for Music Study and Performance
________________________________
From: Jp Pagán <jplpagan@xxxxxxx>
To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 11:47 AM
Subject: [Harp-L] Low Chromatics
I know this is one of those stubbornly recurring questions, but in light of recent advancements I have to wonder why we don't see any chromatics pitched below Tenor C*?
Both Seydel and Hohner make diatonics below this range, notably Low Low F, which would be just over half an octave below the Tenor C 270. They sound great as diatonics. Given the use of windsavers on chromatics, I'd think it'd be even more doable there. Or at least say, a Low A or Bb chromatic.
Is there a real technical limitation I'm missing, or is it just a case of there not being much demand?
--JP
*(maybe more rightly called C3, the C below Middle C)
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.