Re: [Harp-L] Re: not part of "all things harmonica?"
I never 'met a discussion' group I liked better.
On 22 August 2012 05:54, <BluzeHarp@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would add to Michelle's plea that most members don't read all the posts.
>
>
> I didn't know until 5 minutes ago that a 'meta discussion group' about the
> future of Harp-L even existed. I think the discussion should be held
> on-list so that the highest number of interested parties are aware and
> therefore able to contribute to the dialogue.
>
> As always, thanks for your efforts,
>
> Christopher Richards
>
--
Rick Dempster
EÃâÅResources/Serials
LR&A
RMIT Libraries
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.