[Harp-L] Re: not part of "all things harmonica?"
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: not part of "all things harmonica?"
- From: BluzeHarp@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:54:53 -0400 (EDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1345578893; bh=JGNCEE/OjhMJziLDGVquBsBEF8xOMInTxDifrloTEaM=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Gw38Q7whdJSPX/gVeOQqOSi+SYqDTd7GaEJo1sArMAo5unhI0G7a12ezxBxVosut2 QyJHtN9JFxzIdYnnKyLcUbHeYHTf6Jwboblo8xtNhyvifFmoRpFFkfxhPdxv0H3FBa X8B7NTPYrKXm8wAoAXN/Dv1sGP3mlRzG/kxsD0j0=
I would add to Michelle's plea that most members don't read all the posts.
I didn't know until 5 minutes ago that a 'meta discussion group' about the
future of Harp-L even existed. I think the discussion should be held
on-list so that the highest number of interested parties are aware and
therefore able to contribute to the dialogue.
As always, thanks for your efforts,
Christopher Richards
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.