Re: [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?



Oh,.... ok :)  (that's why the question mark)

On Aug 7, 2012, at 5:13 AM, Steve Shaw wrote:

> 
> 
> 
>> On 7 August 2012 14:36, Joseph Leone <3n037@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> It's bigger?
>>> s-j
>  Well yeah, but my 270 is also bigger than a standard diatonic, and bigger than an XB40, but it isn't as loud as an XB40...  		 	   		  





This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.