RE: [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?

To: harp-l harp-l <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?
From: Steve Shaw <moorcot@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 10:13:48 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <0Le53E-1TWfFl0bHA-00psDA@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de>
References: <0Le53E-1TWfFl0bHA-00psDA@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de>



> On 7 August 2012 14:36, Joseph Leone <3n037@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > It's bigger?
> > s-j
  Well yeah, but my 270 is also bigger than a standard diatonic, and bigger than an XB40, but it isn't as loud as an XB40...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?
  - From: Rick Dempster
- Re: [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?
  - From: Joseph Leone

References:
- Re: [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?
  - From: paul@fieldy.co.uk

Previous by Date: [Harp-L] Re: Mystery depression-era harmonica (visual)
Next by Date: [Harp-L] Re: Low Hohner Harps
Previous by Thread: Re: [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?
Next by Thread: Re: [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?
Harp-L August 2012 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
Harp-L list archive Table of Contents
More information about the Harp-L mailing list

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.