Re: [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?

To: Blunt White <playharp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?
From: Joseph Leone <3n037@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 00:36:19 -0400
Cc: harp-l <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <SNT126-W36F6C32361A351672C7A0DC0CE0@phx.gbl>
References: <SNT126-W36F6C32361A351672C7A0DC0CE0@phx.gbl>

It's bigger?
s-j

On Aug 6, 2012, at 11:54 PM, Blunt White wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 
> In connection with the discussion on the SUB 30 it has been mentioned that the XB 40 is louder than a standard 10 hole diatonic.  I agree, but why?  Thoughts? Regards, Blunt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?
  - From: Rick Dempster

References:
- [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?
  - From: Blunt White

Previous by Date: [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?
Next by Date: Re: [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?
Previous by Thread: [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?
Next by Thread: Re: [Harp-L] XB 40 - why is it louder than a diatonic?
Harp-L August 2012 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
Harp-L list archive Table of Contents
More information about the Harp-L mailing list

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.