Re: [Harp-L] Impedance questions and some (probably) crazy thoughts on volume controls in crystal mics
- To: Tom Skailes <tom.skailes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Impedance questions and some (probably) crazy thoughts on volume controls in crystal mics
- From: MARK BURNESS <markwjburness@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:12:11 +0000 (GMT)
- Cc:
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1298131931; bh=onNDttZM5aKrVsK4fR4T+0Zk/uc4pBC4OuZggatfpJU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hQIq55tj1g8kgo5rB9if0djQcpMhuD1pgs22nRVu5T4oq/v1X2GFGAxNinSeBCde+U3y6fKxlTM5tySw6gVE7JFbG46bS2Dvg71cwHNVraa64AHE7p+6CZXJSnrc/bBoU+1SoUlrxxa2oi7WfZ0XrsG/JmU9VX3VrWyFmgd+AUU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cBv7d96wu4hKnXn000rntPyIogEla5uEcXO/WQ6kdnCumvothuvmUfWMLFdLEtgK1amaC1NtRP/mHqki6kqYrKbxYUCLBLLH3+wi/cubfhHb+4+B8B7+gqKTzDElsXHU+UC6p5QJEbnDNYJrxpg6/HAjbUPDWgELAR4MrW8emyE=;
- In-reply-to: <4D5FCF5D.3040500@talktalk.net>
- References: <4D5FCF5D.3040500@talktalk.net>
A lot of questions Tom...
point 3 - I would recommend NOT removing the input resistor on the amp, if you
were to plug in a crystal mic without a volume pot, without a delay pedal, the
amp's input grid would see an infinite load and send the tube into thermal
runaway. You theoretically can remove the resistor if you ALWAYS use a
delay/volume pot, it's just not really a wise move.
If you have a device between the mic & the amp input, the output impedance of
that device becomes the input impedance of the amp, the 5.6Meg now helps to
prevent signal bleed to ground between the device & amp. Theoretically, once
over a certain value, the amp's input impedance should,'t make any difference
whether 1M or 5.6M...but I assure you that it does (AC impedance & dc resistance
are not the same thing.
A Jayphat style device will also work with all other kinds of mic, it is not
something that is exclusive to crystals.
If you plug your 2M mic (vol ful up) into a 5.6Meg input, directly, then yes the
overall load is ~1.5M, less if the pot is turned down, there is no way round
this, the resistance of the pot's wiper to ground, in parallel 5.6Meg is always
the lowest common denominator. Adding resistors in series with the signal from
mic pot to amp, or from element to pot does not change this, it just adds series
resistance in the signal path which may dull tone. This is relevant to your
point 5, depending on the signal voltage, putting the pot in series with the
signal may dull off tone...it may not?
If your delay robs tone seriously, then a Jayphat will help the input impedance,
but not affect anything later in the delay circuit that might be screwing up the
tone (there are a lot of components in a delay, the input is just one aspect).
You should not NEED a Jayphat to get your amp working satisfactorily with a
delay, though it might be a useful thing to have. Select a delay pedal that
doesn't screw up the tone too much (anything you plug into, between mic & amp
has some effect), assess this effect by plugging straight into the amp, then
through the delay - don't just turn the delay on & off. Some players actually
like a delay that softens tone slightly, others want to keep things tight. Most
players do not use Jayphat style devices, though I'm not trying to put you off
building one.
Cheers, Mark.
________________________________
From: Tom Skailes <tom.skailes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, 19 February, 2011 14:10:37
Subject: [Harp-L] Impedance questions and some (probably) crazy thoughts on
volume controls in crystal mics
Hi Guys
This may cover some old ground, so apologies if that's the case.
I'm just getting round to building a Jayphat impedance matching box so I can run
a delay/echo pedal with my MC-151 blues blaster crystal mic. Been thinking about
achieving a good high impedance to the crystal element and had a number of
thoughts/questions that it would be great to get some feedback/advice on - I
haven't looked at circuit theory for over 30 years so you'll have to forgive my
ignorance ;) :
1 - my blaster has a 2 Meg vol control pot in the Rod Piazza 'Hot Rod' circuit
configuration (I think) with the capacitor. I have a 5.6Meg resistor in the
input of my Bassman RI. Because the pot and the resistor are in parallel, my
understanding is that when the pot is full on, the effective impedance to the
crystal is 1474k. The first question is, when the vol pot is turned to say half,
the circuit layout suggests that this presents part of the pot resistor in
series, with the remainder in parallel with the amp's resistor, so at the exact
halfway point I (probably wrongly) calculate an impedance to the crystal of 1Meg
+ 848k - is this correct, or does it remain constant, regardless of the vol pot
setting?
2 - On the JT30 site I found an article that mentioned putting a resistor in
parallel across the output from the vol pot as a means to make a linear taper
pot more 'audio' in its operation. The author of the article stated that the
crystal would see the full impedance of the vol pot, whilst the amp would see
the impedance of the resistor after the pot. To me this doesn't sound correct -
but I could well be wrong - my thoughts are that a 5Meg pot with a 1Meg resistor
following in parallel across the outputs, coupled with the typical 1Meg resistor
in the input of a guitar amp would at full pot volume result in an impedance to
the crystal of 454k, whilst at the halfway volume point, provided my maths is
correct, 2.5Meg + 416k (result of 2.5M/1M/1M in parallel)? Which is right?
3 - The volume pot can dull the tone of the crystal and some people suggest
removing the vol pot from the mic circuit. With my Bassman that would give me
the full 5.6Meg impedance to the crystal, or on a typical guitar amp input 1Meg.
This leads to my first probably crazy question - to avoid the problem of
parallel resistors dropping the impedance to the crystal, would it be
possible/sensible to remove the amp's input impedance resistor from the circuit,
based on the (probably erroneous) assumption that the vol pot in the mic
effectively replaces it. I'm thinking this might be OK when the mic is connected
to the amp, but might cause excessive squealing or hum when the mic jack is
pulled from the amp socket. What's the story on this?
4 - As per 3, what would the effect be of dropping the 5.6Meg input resistor out
of the Jayphat circuit - would anything get fried if the Jayphat was
accidentally turned on without a mic jack connected? My understanding is that
the J-FET in the Jayphat has essentially infinite impedance. I'm guessing that
this might only be beneficial for crystal elements, if at all. This is related
to a second article on the JT30 site which suggested putting an op amp inside
the mic between the element and the pot, so that the crystal saw a massive
impedance, but the amp saw much less - this sounds a bit like trying to cram the
Jayphat circuit plus two 9v batteries between the crystal and the vol pot, with
the vol pot as part of the Jayphat circuit - has anyone tried this?
5 - Final crazy question/thought: Is it possible to wire the vol pot in the mic
so it's a variable resistor in series with the crystal element? I'm guessing
that at full 'off' on the pot, sound would still come through, the level of
which would depend of the ratio between the pot and the amp's input resistor.
Would this work? In this configuration I'm guessing that the minimum impedance
presented to the crystal would be the value of the amp's input resistor, and the
maximum would be the sum of the pot plus resistor???
Anyway, as I said, there is probably some/much wrong/muddled thinking amongst
the above, and I'll probably just end up building the Jayphat as per the
schematic on the Harp-L site, but it all got me thinking.
Regards
Tom
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.