Re: [Harp-L] Little Walter
- To: Mick Zaklan <mzaklan@xxxxxxxxx>, harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Little Walter
- From: MARK BURNESS <markwjburness@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 21:03:31 +0100 (BST)
- Cc:
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1313438611; bh=9XWMn8S+hgQq0Nk1EKBBhr5GyRp8BftCEtqhhaMObt8=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rAvlcs6NXYSDJDHXQ1LH3paRV2wOG7sRdsw/FUq4zmkwDm2MRnzjcXJqR3080GTmCe7TE1nKVKP80nyYpJaBg6k73i1cBbWU1m3+gStcEpTdC61O3kQggoz4btjDCuYOH9qJjK289z1HnDu2mVmh3wkeyeWEjGget1eycrA4Gag=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=siBqmCIx2m8qkheRR588360S2p5Pzjq6BfGa3g0fKF0ga2K0kuugQcF1P7FiDVFFn0E7LaWTR5zeu+Ox9a3VJcOOdGU/u2Wzipu3Oj6zjiLFwi+3dd3UxL2UsCBnwrlu7l0Dfl+1ZHAPj1RCGqdXurt0VclY0hPLRS7LsihSX38=;
- In-reply-to: <CAF1Dgr7-q=QJ-N0g0CV0c4tsdaq0cC=9dY+5i461ZFNbY=e21g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAF1Dgr7-q=QJ-N0g0CV0c4tsdaq0cC=9dY+5i461ZFNbY=e21g@mail.gmail.com>
I have to say that any inferrence that West (with a "T") Weston is "doing" or
"completely recreating" Little Walter is quite unfair & innaccurate. He's
authentic alright, a great frontman & sideman, rooted in classic postwar blues,
but he is no copyist.
There may be a few bars in several minutes of performance that echo some of
Walter's phrases, but that's about it. West has a very different sound, phrasing
and attack. Less legato, punchier, a middier bite.
About the only aspect that I can find that they have in common is that West
plays with a fluency that few musicians achieve, he plays harp like most folk
speak their mother tongue.
Was Walter ahead of his time? Well, I guess if recreating his playing was
commonplace today, then I might agree, in that respect. But it isn't. There are
only really about a dozen players around who can do a passable impression.
Unique? Certainly. Timeless? Sure, I'd agree much of it remains fresh, no matter
how many times you hear it...and there's always more to hear.
For me, a lot of the seduction of Little Walter's playing is the "intangibility"
of it, that it's elusive & hard to master and there's a dynamic to his playing
that isn't common today.
Regards, Mark.
________________________________
From: Mick Zaklan <mzaklan@xxxxxxxxx>
To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, 15 August, 2011 20:39:32
Subject: [Harp-L] Little Walter
Coincidentally, the Chicago Sun-Times mentions Little Walter in their
lead editorial today. Instructing folks to hit www.bluesheaven.com and
listen to Little Walter's "My Babe" running in the background of Willie
Dixon's foundation website before reading the editorial. To get the
importance and feel of Chicago blues. It's a piece on turning the Chess
Studios and the surrounding neighborhood into a tourist zone similar to Sun
Studios in Memphis.
Listening to the Wes Weston clip doing Little Walter and Little Walter
himself in today's posts reminded me of a conversation I had decades ago
with Chicago harpist Ron Sorin. Ron told me he never had any interest in
completely recreating somebody else's harp style but he understood the
"seduction" of Walter's playing. It's a "complete" style; it works in a lot
of different settings; and to this day it still sounds modern, Ron felt. I
agreed.
Kind of reminds me of the old Studebaker Avanti. I was a kid when that
car came out and year after year, decade after decade, that automobile still
looked like the most modern thing on the road to me. Same deal with
Walter's stuff. Way ahead of its time. My opinion.
Mick Zaklan
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.