Re: [Harp-L] Re. Powerbender Based Tuning
- To: "Arthur Jennings" <timeistight@xxxxxxxxx>, "Brendan Power" <bren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re. Powerbender Based Tuning
- From: gnarlyheman@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:25:02 +0000
- Cc: Harp-l <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-rim-org-msg-ref-id :message-id:content-transfer-encoding:reply-to:x-priority:references :in-reply-to:sensitivity:importance:to:cc:subject:from:date :content-type:mime-version; bh=QF/eGUwNCXd86xwmoGw+9blh0xdlvMQw6YbWFhAzww0=; b=TMAm1L2NADmUsL4AbYimi9j8DCxO6nkQgMO/ffsCqysov05toi0XPnq9RmnbDLPRMT C051ciCzSiSYWGb+uARjjJVWDhH0YikenkZlv3XTTUChrLW/nhaB6xKabK5j6ayMcYgR Pe0cZjLEvMABg60ySbLcVRynER4yLsgCzhp1o=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=x-rim-org-msg-ref-id:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:reply-to :x-priority:references:in-reply-to:sensitivity:importance:to:cc :subject:from:date:content-type:mime-version; b=X+2fsGudvZDi+cH+5cWme9Bea4AUA3wSxou2S1ffHatJ08w4gzCaNYbGgQBkNcTMSB 6PART9KfxDaeth6kI2WyAGO6tp+f96zdTqGrtt2MYMab8a59wyATK6Kxilp5e60GLbh0 cIolsGce4JHC60bRkqhTs9taLAu6bS9Pqffi4=
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTikGWmEi5hjWJF3YDyum=9eSzjcp6j0s87vHH551@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20EEC3D3395340F9B457C6305D5D2EAF@SonyBaby><AANLkTikGWmEi5hjWJF3YDyum=9eSzjcp6j0s87vHH551@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: gnarlyheman@xxxxxxxxx
- Sensitivity: Normal
Oh yeah, me too.
G
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Jennings <timeistight@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: harp-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:18:34
To: Brendan Power<bren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re. Powerbender Based Tuning
I stand corrected. Sorry about that.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Brendan Power <bren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> @Rob Paparazzi: Thanks for your comments Rob. Can't wait to hear what you
> come up with on the PowerBender. I think it will really suit your jazz
> sensibilities.
>
> I agree: tunings should not be patented, but they should be credited to the
> inventor.
>
> Arthur Jennings wrote: "I think Gary is right that this tuning (two 6th
> chords a whole tone apart) is basically the Magic Bop tuning which was
> invented several years ago by Richard "*Magic Dick*" Salwitz."
>
> Not so - it's called the Power Chromatic Tuning (see my earlier post). It
> was invented by me and used on gigs and recordings all through the 1980s. I
> used different variations, but mostly the double sixth chord (that's still
> the tuning on 90% of the chromatics in my harp case today). I used a hybrid
> diatonic version called Regular Breath Tuning on my 1884 album 'Country
> Harmonica', and the first recording using the full tuning on chromatic was
> 'State of the Harp', recorded in 1989, released 1990 - two years before the
> Salwitz/Beauregard patent.
>
> In addition to featuring Power Chromatic Tuning, State of the Harp was the
> first album to use half-valved chromatics. Check out these clips, all in
> Power Chromatic tuning or variations:
>
>
> http://www.brendan-power.com/Music%20Clips/State%20of%20the%20Harp/30/SOTH-0
> 2.mp3<http://www.brendan-power.com/Music%20Clips/State%20of%20the%20Harp/30/SOTH-0%0A2.mp3>
>
> http://www.brendan-power.com/Music%20Clips/State%20of%20the%20Harp/30/SOTH-0
> 3.mp3<http://www.brendan-power.com/Music%20Clips/State%20of%20the%20Harp/30/SOTH-0%0A3.mp3>
>
> http://www.brendan-power.com/Music%20Clips/State%20of%20the%20Harp/30/SOTH-0
> 7.mp3<http://www.brendan-power.com/Music%20Clips/State%20of%20the%20Harp/30/SOTH-0%0A7.mp3>
>
> http://www.brendan-power.com/Music%20Clips/State%20of%20the%20Harp/30/SOTH-0
> 9.mp3<http://www.brendan-power.com/Music%20Clips/State%20of%20the%20Harp/30/SOTH-0%0A9.mp3>
>
> My recordings with the tuning in both diatonic and chromatic versions (I
> have many more from that period) prior to the Salwitz/Beauregard patent
> nullify not only their claim to have patented that particular tuning, but
> the entire basis of their patent - which was to claim ALL tunings that had
> the draw reed above the blow reed in seven or more consecutive holes!!
>
> What the inspectors at the US Patent Office were thinking when they awarded
> it is an enduring mystery; it should have been thrown out immediately.
> Whatever, my recordings show it to be entirely baseless. Both my 11 hole
> diatonics and 12 and 16 hole chromatics had every draw above every blow
> note
> (except in the top hole in some cases). Not only that, the Diminished and
> Whole Tone Tunings had been patented years before, and both of them have
> every draw a tone above every blow. Obviously the US Patent Office
> inspectors were very ignorant, or lazy, or both.
>
> I think most people would agree that the person who invents something has
> the right to name it. Unless someone comes up with recorded evidence that
> the tuning Daniel shows in his post was around before I created it in 1978,
> I claim to be the inventor. It's name is Power Chromatic Tuning.
>
> Brendan Power
> WEBSITE: http://www.brendan-power.com
> YOUTUBE: http://www.youtube.com/BrendanPowerMusic
>
>
>
--
Arthur Jennings
http://www.timeistight.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.