Subject: [Harp-L] An Amazing Performance
Rick Davis writes:
"but here is the really amazing part. His harp
amp was a Fender Frontman 15R. That's right... He won the day with a cheap
little solid state amp that is bundled with a Squire Strat in a $200
"Guitar
Starter Kit" at Wal-Mart. It isn't even the new model of the Frontman 15
that sells for $79.99. It's a late-90s version that sold for even less."
It is? THAT is what you think is the 'really amazing part'? ???!!!
What am I missing?
I must be terribly naive. See...here I'm thinking that
'The really amazing part' is that he achieved something extraordinary...
played well enough to garner major applause and kudos from an audience of his
peers.
Yet you single out the cheapness of his gear as 'The' most important
factor, mention his playing as 'pretty' amazing before you launch into this
discussion of his Amps.
Who cares? There's something surely wrong then about how I think of
playing harmonica if the Amp is THE most important feature rather than the
player and his instrument, and if your ideas of harmonica playing (major rants
about what Charlie Musselwhite should or should not carry on board a plane
come to mind) are what people care about most today.
If I'd been there I wouldn't have spared a thought towards what he played
through... wouldn't have noticed at all, in fact. All I'D have heard was his
actual playing, and the effect it had on me and the audience, and whether
or not I liked/enjoyed what I heard.
Frankly I could give a hoot if someone plays through the PA system or sans
any amplification of any kind. Can he/she deliver 'the goods'? - is far
more important..... IS he/she a player?.... Does he/she move me?...are far
more important factors in what I think of as a great performance...JUST as
I would that of any other instrumentalist.
I've never once looked at or cared what Amps Peter White plays through when
I go to his many concerts/shows. ALL I care about is listening to his
wonderful guitar playing (and I honestly don't care what guitar he uses).
Perhaps you who focus your entire lives on what someone plays 'through'
are forgetting the simple reality and needs of the audience. The rest of us
really don't care what gear is onstage. We're there to hear the performer
not the gear, so adding that paragraph at the end of the 'review' - which
certainly seems to have been your entire raison d'etre for writing the
review in the first place, was superfluous and did nothing but take away from
his achievement, no matter how you slice and dice it.
Umm...what was the name of the player again? Oh right. Clay Kirkland.
Elizabeth
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.