oops, my mistake. I was referring to Golden Age, you were referring to Diamond Age. Sorry.
You may be talking about 99. Unfortunately I wasn't there. That's the one that included Toots. I DO have an audio of the event. I'm referring to 97, 98, and 99.
> The idea was that, between the two > events.
> both beginner and more advanced players would find exactly what they > needed.
What you're saying is elitist. It smacks of "Hey, if you're a beginner, go to Buckeye, we're not interested, but if you're advanced, come to spah".
(koff), uh, interpretation may be in the mind of the reader. We wanted SPAH to be a different experience than Buckeye. SPAH was headed into a more professional direction than Buckeye, which was more user friendly. Nothing wrong with that.
To say ""Hey, if you're a beginner, go to Buckeye, we're not interested, but if you're advanced, come to spah" sounds to my ears like a bit of "spin doctoring" harkening back to the ol' Tate/ Iceman exchanges.
In all fairness, I used to be a lot more of an a**hole back then. The problem with having an "a**holectamy" is that people tend to hold onto the old image longer than is necessary. (I dug my own pit. I accept the responsibility and am not angered by responses like this - more amused than anything else).
Ok, so the fact that I played Buckeye 03, 05, 07, (and other years) makes me a beginner.
See, another example of spin doctoring, throwing a negative curve on a posting that never stated that those that play at Buckeye are beginners.
And I GAVE him the credit. Now I can't say anything about Bob as I had no interaction with him, but on several occasions, I made suggestions to the rest of the establishment (Mitchell, Dobson, Harris, etc), and it fell on deaf ears. Ya know why? No respect.
Still harboring feelings of resentment, perhaps?
Once again, my mistake. Sorry. Thought you were talking pre Tate conventions.
OK, Fearless Joe. You're the Man! :>)