[Harp-L] Re: Butter TV spot
- To: "John F. Potts" <hvyj@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: Butter TV spot
- From: Ev630 <eviltweed@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:32:33 +1100
- Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=pq5btNWdtOuDm7aVoe9DjhZ3W3Q/g3EfWSohXgBLbP4=; b=pDEbzAPff6s99HEaArG2eEX7yOQePfd5qQT5CXjqN2kLOtIZ0ii/ne+cKFN7pZEu2N 4pCBFmay+3PfdjlELKW7zjny+rhdfXrXTGNAUJ+aoz1NRNr/LsA55N8/fBDvJnTOkeC3 hLsyxwaM+2OytMjPbVpSC7ReuYriBTIDKjIRc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=lljVrZLadvHCo3+oVDRBbWG7V9lDlbYupfkYq2XHvfj0U38PdpppvsfDjllqzfGcDU H9zs1Z8Z+Tb2RuYIEeE6jUKjfM7J6M1DgTfnnH2giXHYYBWjpoJ//dgDEGgVW2Xgak5A 1QaVoX4rfLMO8VxTsYnMLx+LDUFMqpXYukonU=
- In-reply-to: <4E45947B-AD58-4181-BDC7-9A5B39E45DD8@bex.net>
- References: <4E45947B-AD58-4181-BDC7-9A5B39E45DD8@bex.net>
John,
I wasn't addressing that comment to you, but more broadly to some (but not
all) of the other responses.
I do think (again as a general observation) it's going to be hard for anyone
to objectively establish that Butterfield was the last harmonica player to
be emotionally expressive with the instrument, which I think is what Tom
Ellis was contending.
cheers
Drew
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 7:31 PM, John F. Potts <hvyj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ev 630 writes:
>>
>
> I have to say that I am still inclined to think that (with some stellar
>> exceptions) a lot of what is being presented is subjective appreciation of
>> Butterfield as a performer (why you personally dig him) rather than
>> objective comparative analysis to define his place in the history of harp
>> music.
>>
>
> Drew,
>
> i was writing in response to comments about the comparative depth and
> sincerity of of emotion expressed in PB's playing. When we talk about the
> emotion evoked by any artist, the assessment is necessarily subjective.
>
> A more objective musical assessment of PB would include an explanation of
> the highly musical nature of his note selection and the quality of his tone
> and technique. I don't have a good enough ear to identify and articulate
> why his note selection is consistently so exceptional, but it is and there
> are others on the list who have the expertise to explain why. PB almost
> invariably plays "right notes" with a terrific sense of time, meter and
> placement. Unfortunately, I do not have the musical knowledge or expertise
> to analyze and explain why this is so, but I know enough to recognize that
> it is not simply because I happen to like what he does.
>
> As far as tone and technique is concerned, I am not aware of anyone
> expressing the view that PB was anything less than masterful in that regard.
> So i assume there is no debate on that point.
>
> Best regards,
>
> JP
>
>
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.