Re: [Harp-L] re: lee oskars
Is it possible that the brand is a reflection of the philosophy on how the Owner/artist plays the instrument?
I've never heard Lee go for that fat chicago sound. His approach was always lighter, a bit of treble, and playing the notes.
-----Original Message-----
From: jim.alciere@xxxxxxxxx
To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, Aug 31, 2009 10:00 am
Subject: [Harp-L] re: lee oskars
Lee Oskars are tuned differently than Marine Bands.They're also kind of
bright. When I listen back to recordings I've made, the harp seems a little
trebly compared to old blues recordings. I believe the fault lies with the
player rather than the instrument (playing too hard). Bright is nice for
single note runs--cuts through the mix.With a tight cup, a bullet mic, and a
tube amp I can get a good rock and roll sound. I use Lee Oskars because they
last longer-. Thirty bucks is real money and I can't afford to buy three or
four harps every six months..
I don't do anything to my harps. I had a hard time just replacing the reed
plate. Found it to be a pain in the butt so I just buy new harps.
I find Lee Oskars to be substantially louder than Marine Bands.
--
Rainbow Jimmy
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1372404/dhoozh_chapter_1.html
http://www.myspace.com/theelectricstarlightspaceanimals
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.