Re: [Harp-L] MANJI, HARRISON, CROSSOVER,ETC...
- To: Joe and Cass Leone <leone@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] MANJI, HARRISON, CROSSOVER,ETC...
- From: Zack <zack.pomerleau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:46:45 -0400
- Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx, jeremyhsnell@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=EDEd/psvV5Pth0Fn2Kc5qG12Yn9WrHqn51fMLJzv9JI=; b=byW4+DPXkXWj2bezK4ArWNlxefbrFQyrHm2u0/AxbGYdqEAKrA3ljYP6F5Li1UOyuq a1pcfEDGq3ZQ5AphJSw+QJMoDXykMe2U7dME0brb8bZhBwwmmv8/JG8u+Tjo1Luh6rsx ZJDNrIbaApWSJoILC4e/eK5DVIq0j3p+myljs=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=T3DX2QbD7U5lhRKtEJgTdJUKA10AW9yhQ37UgVBoX/AvxYwX7NvoLZUNxTGUPcn4nM lwnOx+9a8UNgvB10vG322wnqZQGP2ZDsuMyS4RLU6MFW/CYdOP6nPXcLpRB+jrrQ78eG GXbI9zcKEYcrPEV+QXDLt+HFud5JwpHpVxB4k=
- In-reply-to: <146450E1-04E2-4FA7-8AE4-B4AB488CEC3B@ewol.com>
- References: <8CBE7E9181CA20A-724-54F@FWM-D13.sysops.aol.com> <146450E1-04E2-4FA7-8AE4-B4AB488CEC3B@ewol.com>
If you played the guitar, you'd be spending the big bucks on instruments.
I say if the Manji is under a hundred bucks it is worth it.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Joe and Cass Leone <leone@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2009, at 11:48 AM, jeremyhsnell@xxxxxxx wrote:
> So many of us players want to play out of the box harps and toss them when
>> a reed goes. Special 20 - out 25 bucks, still so much less expensive than
>> customs. It would be nice if the Manji actually does perform that much
>> better, lasts longer, and actually IS affordable enough to replace cheaper
>> than to replace a reed. I hate to offend any customizers, but all the
>> perfect tuning is lost on so many of us amplified blues players, most of
>> whom appreciate only the ease of playing a well-gapped harp, and not all the
>> other nuances provided by a very expensive arsenal of highly modified cheap
> I was going to say this yesterday but trashed my message. In fact, I trash
> over 67% of my messages. What's that? I should trash ALL of them? Ok, back
> to the subject. People are really going overboard trying to make everything
> perfect and tuning to exact cents and stuff. Then they go and blow it all by
> blowing it all. Unless you are giving a concert where the back-up WON't
> interfere with YOUR wonderful tone and unless you can deliver all YOUR
> style, personality, inventive unique runs, fluidity, angst, terror, hurt,
> laughter, good naturedness, moroseness, laconicicity, WITHOUT the back-up
> music making a fiasco out of it, what's the point.
> Now I'm not trying to beat anyone out of a sale here but giving a custom
> harp to most players is like giving Tiger Wood's golf clubs to most
> golfers......won't help. As for the manufacturers, instead of constantly
> making these 'improved' models, they should be concentrating on UNIFORMITY.
> Instead of 76 harps being good in a batch of 100, it should be 96+. They
> need to get off their hinies and get REAL people to test these things and
> anything that doesn't make the grade goes in the 'seconds' bin. I have never
> seen harps sold as 'seconds'. Why IS that? They need to cut the hell down on
> the number of models and make a FEW models..very very well.
> As I write this I am am becoming painfully aware that my opinion is highly
>> hypocritical to my immediate surrounding of dozens of K$ of mics and amps,
>> however...? some of us baby our gear, yet are tough on harps -
>> Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
> Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
-Just Finished: The Sun Also Rises by Ernest Hemingway.
-Currently Reading: Nothing, tomorrow going to pick up Brave New World, only
-Currently Writing: "Chastity's Lief Harmonica."
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and