Re: [Harp-L] XLR>1/4 inch IMT
- To: "John F. Potts" <hvyj@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] XLR>1/4 inch IMT
- From: gbuxman@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:43:26 -0700
- Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=31OAoIRNP4h+Zsxfw3yjKY/Gj3xqvV+rUIIOV1MnjXU=; b=JrnpT6JotonkEAFHIxL7ajFmrq0/0V42FnF5ukVFoMDpoa2Yx+P8LDWkfZmQrVwWry 5mIODjI4lCizJ8E1037M5rILQ/78Au7+tQHyTr6OV/yKQk2F4nyBxfwJ121aDci6jV0U 6cKX99a/69jmHPgcTu9CLwJSNMsoV18RF48AM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=rB15zLFCnYKtQpke/fgs5rJMIJR1WNgjqlGNW6W+FzCw59UFmVdliA7KphlKX+GrpH pnSD1DgaWVNrPXQXehijxZG5Y+wuAUZekpeospno6a2GkCTq351BqPyp+xmOwqY+8UCo JvsQgnxmw0fEGFCVxltdL3J7j2lqg+xbQucIE=
- In-reply-to: <FA8BBF7F-AFBC-434B-8245-11D33269C486@bex.net>
- References: <807C464C-AC9F-4A08-A0B9-41AB5308F5A0@bex.net> <2d2d87b10809131440h2b25af69m1503b1021979fd5@mail.gmail.com> <FA8BBF7F-AFBC-434B-8245-11D33269C486@bex.net>
- Sender: guybuxman@xxxxxxxxx
John,
Thank you for your kind reply. I'm glad to know that connector style
isn't the determining factor.
- Guy
On 9/13/08, John F. Potts <hvyj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> GB,
> i have more experience as a musician than a technician, and i have
> almost no experience w/ wireless units, so I'd prefer to let others
> on the list with greater expertise provide an explanation. But it
> has to do with ohms of the mic output and whether the signal is
> "balanced" or "unbalanced." The type of connector is NOT the
> controlling factor in determining whether you need an impedance
> matching transformer... and it's certainly NOT a dumb question.
> JP
>
>
> On Sep 13, 2008, at 5:40 PM, gbuxman@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Ok, in the spirit of the old saying, "there's no such thing as a dumb
>> question"...
>>
>> Why is impedence matching necessary? What will happen if you don't
>> do it?
>>
>> I currently play through a Shaker dynamic mic, with a male XLR. I
>> specified this construction when ordering the Shaker because I wanted
>> to use my Samson Airline wireless system with its female XLR
>> transmitter.
>>
>> So I just use a cable that has a female XLR on one end, and a male
>> 1/4" connector on the other. As far as I can tell it works fine.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> - GB
>>
>> On 9/13/08, John F. Potts <hvyj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Rick.
>>> As a long time devotee of non-bullet style mics for harmonica, I
>>> have more than casual experience with XLR>1/4 inch impedance matching
>>> transformers. My cumulative wisdom on this subject (for whatever it
>>> may be be worth) is as follows: The Radio Shack unit works fine, but
>>> (like the Shure IMT) it is much longer than a standard 1/4 inch plug
>>> as it protrudes from the input jack of your amp and is even more
>>> lengthy with the output of the XLR cord connected to it. This
>>> creates leverage that will put significant pressure on the input
>>> jack if the cord is pulled or the transformer is bumped (as
>>> inevitably happens) which can and often will damage the jack on the
>>> amp and/or bend the input plug on the transformer. Accordingly, it
>>> may be preferable he to use a "pigtail" transformer on which the XLR
>>> receptor is separated from the 1/4" jack with a short length of mic
>>> cord, so only the 1/4 inch plug protrudes from the jack on the amp.
>>> Peavey makes one and I am sure other manufacturers do as well. I
>>> also think they may be easier to handle and carry around,. But all
>>> of the impedance matching transformers i have ever used sound fine
>>> and about the same EXCEPT the pigtail transformer made by Audix. The
>>> one i tried produced a very weak signal that was significantly
>>> diminished in volume and tone. I don't know if the particular Audix
>>> transformer i tried was a defective unit or if they are all that
>>> way. The Audix transformer is a little pricey anyway, although
>>> Audix does make some great mics. Hope this helps.
>>> JP
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
>>> Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
>>>
>
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.