Re: [Harp-L] XLR>1/4 inch IMT
- To: "John F. Potts" <hvyj@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] XLR>1/4 inch IMT
- From: gbuxman@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:40:17 -0700
- Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=NSFaxYny2v3bWbH5ZRo3ApNkCWwsscL/8LA8k0NQBzs=; b=aZScl19UCacEkWodivM1/28QEhvnIwbR96NSZEz3EVFNYmdQmdsaaj51ud7ZWZHTZm 1gBmJBsvqt0twlo5c64tNAHc79x8AipFqugzKcu1++ZsnGrGQMkfSJsbFdVfGvJFwopC MftaQLrkLLHOj9g254YspBiIbA7JAgxSx2iSk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=vFKTvZ50ZUy5pEk5CzJxou43bKn+hmm/NS3K99EmRJY68s1lXxSNLbKcnkaTtLnKM7 0Uv7JPwW8R5oeoARtPWjmyvhFmqPzZB2gAYiiXzze6cWDJXZsHaypVU1WHx9nOXoII5k BSoysNML6ptLXTvfCwVV+dDiyzJtSVK2dfFWM=
- In-reply-to: <807C464C-AC9F-4A08-A0B9-41AB5308F5A0@bex.net>
- References: <807C464C-AC9F-4A08-A0B9-41AB5308F5A0@bex.net>
- Sender: guybuxman@xxxxxxxxx
Ok, in the spirit of the old saying, "there's no such thing as a dumb
question"...
Why is impedence matching necessary? What will happen if you don't do it?
I currently play through a Shaker dynamic mic, with a male XLR. I
specified this construction when ordering the Shaker because I wanted
to use my Samson Airline wireless system with its female XLR
transmitter.
So I just use a cable that has a female XLR on one end, and a male
1/4" connector on the other. As far as I can tell it works fine.
Thanks in advance.
- GB
On 9/13/08, John F. Potts <hvyj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rick.
> As a long time devotee of non-bullet style mics for harmonica, I
> have more than casual experience with XLR>1/4 inch impedance matching
> transformers. My cumulative wisdom on this subject (for whatever it
> may be be worth) is as follows: The Radio Shack unit works fine, but
> (like the Shure IMT) it is much longer than a standard 1/4 inch plug
> as it protrudes from the input jack of your amp and is even more
> lengthy with the output of the XLR cord connected to it. This
> creates leverage that will put significant pressure on the input
> jack if the cord is pulled or the transformer is bumped (as
> inevitably happens) which can and often will damage the jack on the
> amp and/or bend the input plug on the transformer. Accordingly, it
> may be preferable he to use a "pigtail" transformer on which the XLR
> receptor is separated from the 1/4" jack with a short length of mic
> cord, so only the 1/4 inch plug protrudes from the jack on the amp.
> Peavey makes one and I am sure other manufacturers do as well. I
> also think they may be easier to handle and carry around,. But all
> of the impedance matching transformers i have ever used sound fine
> and about the same EXCEPT the pigtail transformer made by Audix. The
> one i tried produced a very weak signal that was significantly
> diminished in volume and tone. I don't know if the particular Audix
> transformer i tried was a defective unit or if they are all that
> way. The Audix transformer is a little pricey anyway, although
> Audix does make some great mics. Hope this helps.
> JP
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
> Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.