Re: [Harp-L] plag(i)arism
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] plag(i)arism
- From: "Leonardo Kenji Shikida" <shikida@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:26:32 -0300
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cWrmfDu6vEsJnuAEyhZPnD+Xo38z5HeBy8ZzLQRmObfWOsQo2bPBoEfVHE6K4GfHgG+X9i6sKDfFRiURDTixQ0BKP0OWC5JWSeunOWapBTbKFYJ3f70ETXUGiqTihDX4RFym34zUIF4OqEGIJLaEMxJ4Mw4ieqKc/zD/mgVF/YU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NQv88Owa5BvnazQsRz/9kbk74NBeGSnYPwz9U3HSl3ibHQXZK/jss+vSW/dLd1XVUs0GAal8fk5tBDHtcwUjmvum8jnjDoHBCoe09vae3VtFW6zZMNUr2kqMNG2Q45GZhPqPAYbXOkm2wIUCYxoNI5za6rPqnrONwlQZAxnPHB4=
- In-reply-to: <001401c7bcbf$4997d090$7564a8c0@GWBGS01>
- References: <200706290510.l5T5Abn5003773@harp-l.com> <000901c7ba6e$e54cc110$7564a8c0@GWBGS01> <46891522.7080601@charter.net> <001401c7bcbf$4997d090$7564a8c0@GWBGS01>
1 & 2 are true-I was there.
As for 3, no one can say how many in the audience would have known the solos
were taken from elsewhere. I believe few if any were wise to the heist.
As for 4, you can change "probably" to " perhaps" if you like but I believe
that was the motive.
When people pay tribute, they usually say so. You could argue with that, and
this Harp-L, after all, where anything that can be agued over will be.
In academia, people get fired for plagarism, to me at least so there is an
issue of honesty here.
-Glenn
Hi Glenn
I think you've raised a valid point and Rupert was brilliant to summarize it.
I deeply respect your sense of justice.
I just think we must be careful on item #4, in which we're judging
that person. We don't know his/her intention.
One thing is being able to reproduce perfectly a famous solo note by
note (and this demands dedication to the instrument). Some people can
be proud of such thing, and as someone said before, inserting a whole
solo of someone else in a performance may be bad taste, or may be a
tribute of some sort, even if it's not explicitly declared.
Another thing is to make money using someone else's creation without
any citation or authorization, and this is a crime, I think.
Very interesting discussion and subject, by the way ;-)
best regards
Kenji
Listen to http://brazilharp.blogspot.com/
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.