Re: [Harp-L] Re: My Omni-bender
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re: My Omni-bender
- From: Zombor Kovacs <zrkovacs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Hemx5Jpg7Xmjl/3pjQrjaMUjUPuIVzrz/3QKTH9cRpWzO5lReBed2mxygcQ4CZB2wwSqqIWzyfw/42DJp3CvUVZrSxWWR8v29nqSyUmsbSJbrlerkDv615NM3JJBl2i2oxmt3PDN/2VQ19dMQIx49fBIzrV5rWu4xWraajQ8d8Q= ;
- In-reply-to: <702585.41019.qm@web59202.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
> I've said before that I think the XB is a legit
> instrument but an All-Bender with traditional size,
> sound and playability would capture lots more
> attention.
There are a few "minor" difficulties to overcome :-)
I mean if you don't want to resize the whole
instrument including reeds for example. But I am sure
that a couple of harp manufacturers are experimenting
with this. Even if anybody has a solution, the end
product should have a good sound, has to be reliable
and has to be mass producable at reasonable costs.
Personally I think the XB40 has a few problems, but
can be made a very nice instrument. I also like the
size, it is very confortable. The sound is another
issue, I think one has to learn to get the best out of
it, also bending has to be re-learnt. A diatonic with
the same bending charachteristics as a standard harp,
would surely be more popular. But then again there is
the price issue. It is very hard to get that harp down
to the size of a diatonic, but I am sure some day
somebody will come out with a marketable 30 reed
product.
Zombor
www.zovax.atw.hu
____________________________________________________________________________________
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.