[Harp-L] Re: My Omni-bender
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: My Omni-bender
- From: Paul Bowering <paul_bowering@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=ZL4nUFNSsuLnfvTMetwBS7kAOgHISg5NrcKjVAwE2B1LxHJ42TY9d4xhAZ4rn3457lO4qoKck4YDeAwBbw2j3y/aY11cYALYzouKVzh60ki3A1FtdEsdJRZwHNPWB70SVu5P/M3A9Ux5BNuXQ3f9aqAST/qmlOO2RVg8X2+L0wI=;
>...aside from the height disadvantage, how does it
>sound?
Basically like whatever harp you use to build it.
>Does it have any other advantages besides shorter
>length?
It allows for what I would call 'shallow' and 'deep'
bends. Let's assume a C harp and look at Hole 4. I
would tune the auxilliary reed to Bb which allows Blow
4 to bend down a semitone to B if you isolate the top
row. But there's more. Draw 4 can bend as normal from
D down to C# but if you isolate the bottom row you can
now also bend that D down to B.
As regards the height I found that the harp performs
well with combs about 75% of their regular height.
Fully assmembled this results in a harp that is about
50% taller than normal. I think you could get it a bit
shorter but I haven't made enough of them to tell
where the drop off in response becomes problematic.
I've said before that I think the XB is a legit
instrument but an All-Bender with traditional size,
sound and playability would capture lots more
attention. I also remain curious as to the design of
Brendan Power's All-Bender. I think he came up with an
idea that didn't require the top/bottom row.
Paul B.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.