Re: [Harp-L] Stupid question about Digitech processors
- To: Slim Heilpern <slim@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Stupid question about Digitech processors
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:58:15 -0500
- Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=DFGM9CzYXpfAoVwi134E3OUvnNdi6XOFxN/zg6ma3vwvaISOY3m+fx2GIsrC3nFj; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:X-Mailer:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Organization: Turtle Hill Productions
- References: <200602012126.k11LQ8cY013412@harp-l.com> <43E12FF0.CF2B6D38@earthlink.net> <43E3842D.8000307@cruzio.com>
The Eventides are nice, no doubt about it. They're awfully pricey
though -- well north of a thousand bucks, if I remember correctly, for
the baseline models.
A number of reverb units from Lexicon, TC Electronics, etc. starting at
$200 new and up, will do pitch shifting too. Things to watch out for
include:
- how good does the pitch-shifter sound? Does it color the sound of the
pitch-shifted material?
- how well does it track with a microphone?
- does it track chords as well as single notes?
- how quickly does it respond to an incoming sound? Do you hear a
notcieable lag between the start of the initial note, and the start of
the pitch-shifted note?
I find that my RP200 does most of these things better than my Lexicon
MPX100, which is a $200 reverb unit. Of course, the Lexicon cleans the
RP's clock when it comes to reverbs, chorus, and flanging.
Regards, Richard Hunter
hunterharp.com
> Slim Heilpern wrote:
>
> Hi Richard -
>
> I was indeed referring to the vocal 300 harmonizer effect.
>
> I checked out the samples on your site and they do sound really good!
> And for some applications I'm very happy with the harmonizer. But if I
> listen critically, I think there are tuning problems, not for all
> pitches but some sound pretty far off to my ears. One of these days
> I'll hook up to my strobe tuner and see how far off it really is
> (positive I'm not imagining this ;-).
>
> Also, the harmonizer adds some dirt to the sound, which can be good
> but is not always desirable. I had recently bought my 300 when I went
> to see Joshua Redman play in a small club and was absolutely floored
> at how beautiful his harmonized tenor sax was (not to mention that I
> was floored, as usual, by his playing -- but that's another story). It
> was crystal clear, very in tune, and the bottom end was absolutely
> beautiful and powerful. Not sure which model I was hearing, but he had
> a couple of Eventide processors sitting next to him on stage.
>
> Not to knock the RP300, it's a wonderful effects box for the price and
> I continue to use it in my setup. I am curious to see what an eventide
> sounds like with my chromatic though....
>
> - Slim.
>
> www.SlideManSlim.com
>
> Richard Hunter wrote:
>
> > Are you talking about the Vocal 300 harmonizer, or the pitch shifter
> > in
> > the RP300A? The pitch shifter in my RP200 tracks well and is in
> > tune.
> > (The whammy effect, a different kind of pitch shifter, isn't in
> > tune,
> > but that's a different story.)
> >
> > You can hear samples of a couple of octave-shifted RP200 sounds at
> > my
> > website at:
> > http://www.hunterharp.com/DigitechRP/
> > You'll see a bunch of folders there -- one of them is for sounds
> > pitch-shifted down an octave. I think the stuff sounds in tune. See
> > what you think.
> >
> > Regards, Richard Hunter
> > hunterharp.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.