[Harp-L] Subject: diatonic vs. chromatic
Bob Meehan writes:
"I believe that this thread is very silly! Why do the chromatic people feel
threatened by the popularity of the diatonic harmonica?
I did not know that this "hundred year war" existed until I attended my
first harmonica convention. In my opinion there would not be any
conventions or harmonica festivals if not for the diatonic harmonica.
I don't think there would be enough people to attend and make it possible
to have these events.
I have also noticed that the diatonic players, of which I am one, have
nothing against the chromatic harmonica, or the people that play them.
Although the music seems to be different, the diatonic players seem to
enjoy the chromatic players music immensely.
It seems to me that some of the chromatic people really dislike the music
played by the diatonic players. Why? I don't know.
And, by the way, we are not limited to playing blues.
All the best,
Bob Meehan:"
......and I couldn't agree more with Bob's take on this particular
contretemps. My first reaction to Randy's pupil's wife's "essay" was "Sheesh, what a
Snob". Then I remembered my feelings following my first Buckeye this past
April and my even stronger gut reaction leaving my very first SPAH at Kansas
City.....that there really are two SPAH's -- one for the "Chromatics" and one
for the rest of us (even though I play chromatic, I'd rather be counted among
"the rest").
I thoroughly enjoyed the SPAH I attended...I met so many terrific people
who are now friends for life. I want to learn diatonic and make that great
noise I heard from the best of the best; Madcat, Howard Levy (and all the
phenomenal players who participated in the Seminars and the Blues Jams). I'm
having difficulty with the diatonic and finally felt there was hope for me to
learn to play Blues when I heard Winslow and Michael play their chroms in the
Jams. Did my heart good. That melding of instruments and styles was
eye-opening. I only regret not managing to fit the Jazz jams into my schedule. Next
time.
Because I walked around and sat in on a couple of spontaneous play-ins in
the lobby by chromatic players, I became very aware of that strong undertone of
dislike from the strictly chromatic players towards those they deem "lesser"
or "unworthy". I actually heard the mutterings on the elevator on quite a
few occasions, and even at the Banquet on our last night.
I suppose the people who allowed me to overhear felt safe enough since I
was carrying my Super 64 at the time, but it struck such a discordant note
because like Bob, I am aware that the diatonic players (not all play Blues as
he's pointed out) are unfailingly polite and respectful towards the purely
Chromatic players and their music, even if it isn't exactly to their taste. I
just don't understand why the reverse isn't true. This prejudice annoys the
heck out of me as it's sadly petty and childish and doesn't belong at SPAH --
especially not from grown men and women in the 21st Century.
I love the sound of a Chromatic and always will. I plan to continue to play
my relaxing standards and now the newer jazz tunes I favor on my chroms.
But I SO want to learn and be involved with the diatonic world as well and
there is absolutely no reason anyone should snobbishly consider it a "step down"
or think that by renaming any harmonica it would save it from obsolescence.
The chromatic harmonica is in no danger of disappearing. I suspect that the
lady who wrote the essay (described as a Chromatic player and not a
Harmonica player by her husband), is more concerned about the style of music she
favors disappearing than she is over the instrument itself. I heard quite a bit
of that at SPAH too.
I'm one who will bridge the gap and play different types of harmonicas and
different styles of music. I know many other people who do not limit their
playing to one type or style as well. As long as there are players like us no
harmonica will become obsolete and perhaps we can reverse this disquieting
(and to my mind quite ridiculous) attempt to equate "Class" with a button.
Elizabeth
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.