[Harp-L] jazz
- To: <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Harp-L] jazz
- From: John Frazer <jfrazer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:09:27 -0800
- In-reply-to: <200511212251.jALMpVWn008823@harp-l.com>
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913
Tom, Are you kidding? Wrong tree indeed. Jazz has many forms. If HL isn't
jazz, than what is? What would you call what he played with Bela Fleck?
I even play a little "jazz". It usually sound bluesy or funky, but it is
jazz to someone.
hj
http://www.myspace.com/harmonicajohns
> <tom_costelloe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Harp-L] Re: William Gallison
> To: Chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <20051121173406.53442.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Chris/George/Tim M et al,
>
> Before we get into who can play Jazz on the diatonic, wouldn't it be more
> fruitful to discuss what contemporary jazz is? I've never heard Howard Levy
> play any 'Jazz,' (can't find his tape Harmonica Jazz for love nor money in
> England) but have always seen his contribution to albums like The Sultan's
> Picnic by Rabih Abou Khalil as applying an advanced western jazz training to
> another culture's musical tradition. What's the difference between 'Jazz' and
> 'improvised music' today? Is 'Jazz' playing the head of a 'standard' then
> improvising over the changes? What are 'Jazz standards' today, and why should
> any musician be constrained by them. Hasn't Jazz had to move away from its
> roots in ragtime/new orleans marches/1930's showtunes etc to survive and grow?
> If so anyone playing heavily improvised music incorporating jazz 'devices'
> over anysort of musical framework is a jazz player, and there are lots of them
> on this list, or ami i barking up the wrong tree...
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.