Fwd: [Harp-L] 545 was: LW and monarch mc 24
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Fwd: [Harp-L] 545 was: LW and monarch mc 24
- From: "John K." <jkuzloski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:56:32 -0000
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=EHDNYCeUy2GFTgz6T2CirTpDnhy0szrTzBqmbjQswPDEHciurYw4YB9P3L1tnbCNS5vd7qN14+JQRD+xAkrVL960J1hAY3gG3K1EL1GkPy9E0T5bCIUe6e1PSrIjIiIE;
- Sender: notify@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
--- In harp-l-archives@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, TomEHarp@xxxx wrote:
for 30 years i was told by at og great harp players that walter
played
through a 545 now i'm finding out what they thought was a 545 was a
monarch mc-24.
or it could have been a slimx that looked similar.bbut not even close
to a 545
i have an old 545 and never liked it cause it feeds real bad. very
thin
sounding. i can not figure how butterfield had such a nice tone
through his.and
walter i do not believe LW ever played through a 545, i could be very
wrong.
tom lee
in ct
peace on earth
play the blues
*****Yeah, those old 545's are no good! Let's lower the demand and
keep the prices down for me. :-)
No insult intended. Personally, I don't find that they feed real
bad. And I'm glad LW didn't play one; it would just drive the price
up higher -- it's tough enough that Butter did! (It's my current
fav -- that's why I felt compelled to reply.)
Be well, all.
--john k.
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@xxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
--- End forwarded message ---
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.