Re: Question: Rad Effects, Processing
I noticed a big typo where I editted two sentences and then combined them
and it was all wrong. Very sorry :(
What I wrote:
>Gimics or not, it seems to me IMHO that there's a lot more 'potential' use
>for these effects, if used with proper restraint, to 'expand' the harp
>voice beyond the current just 'toying around'.
What I meant:
>Gimics or not, it seems to me IMHO that there's a lot more 'potential' use
>for these effects, if used with proper restraint, to 'expand' the harp
>voice beyond the current
*overdriven amplifier sounds -- but not to be*
>just 'toying around'
*with these new gadgets*
Maybe I need some grammar lessons too. Hope this all makes some sense and
is remotely interesting to some of you.
_________________________________________________________________
Harvey A. Andruss, III email: haandruss@xxxxxxx
BUS: (612) 736-4625
FAX: (612) 736-3839
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.