[Harp-L] Re: Our ac/dc harmonica cover
- To: Chris Hofstader <cdh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: Our ac/dc harmonica cover
- From: Boris Plotnikov <ploboris@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:07:46 +0300
- Cc:
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=qlG6vuLVI8aYIG4gyx7z6FN1QyvOHA2OHjp/UcnAzX0=; b=W3ZULtwBO8bHmrYjf1PR3ElFGIRD2wkfNZ5x4rP38n6MGcnfpeYiq1vJo2lnaMS9Vw b1soaU+lAgKpQChfMtZL9ZYHtZNPwkT2iGe2rjrDZMuI4hLj/L/du/OI2SRINVAzAbSj 8obH4WxLxwQYFhPl+oQVSLo5cNUG7kzQmxJJz+/S+34AyoUoi6bFMk64KXsnfsYN5SMx PMOtcUUWYYgTgYNUQxzY3IoMRzoMyuy/ljkfj6wqJWO/OxvDvh+v3i6MaaE9CZmm87Am 3l2o9Ou3Rupj25iSMJFOpEVKQUMInEH67wm2kN07ZygBkLv+b2J8dcV+TIxC13Yf0Qeg rSog==
- In-reply-to: <4B14BA6D-BF9E-4527-A191-C3009967AFCE@hofstader.com>
- References: <CA+4ax3EU4Se-tjgU+aBAbSKnzni2CugTkNApfo8bBidubGt+Jg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGX2p09=OOV9f_bWGtCN7Ynf0yPaFsT=tQ=i_ZNXiMdw7iDJDg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+4ax3G995byJ2UtmhWif=pjWyobsU+0JJO--e6tdtrvfPkzbg@mail.gmail.com> <4B14BA6D-BF9E-4527-A191-C3009967AFCE@hofstader.com>
Actually its simple dynamic cardioid microphone which can be used for close
micing almost everything without too wide range. It have rather good
responce in the middle frequencies, I bought it for harmonica about 6 years
ago then got other mics with better bass responce but keep using it for amp
micing, acoustic harp and vocals live, amp micing.
ÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÑÐÐÐ, 4 ÑÐÐÐÑÑ 2016 Ð. ÐÐÐÑÐÐÐÐÑÐÐÑ Chris Hofstader ÐÐÐÐÑÐÐ:
> [snip] recorded using
> > Sennheiser e835 mic.
> >
> cdh: I use an e835 for podcasting and other voice related recordings and,
> when Shelley Segal, a terrific Australian singer/songwriter who, excepting
> a one song jam with me, has nothing to do with harmonica, played a house
> gig for about 20 people in my living room, it worked wonderfully for her
> singing but this is the first time Iâve heard of anyone using it to record
> an instrument of any kind. Just to satisfy my curiosity, what does it
> provide that a Shure SM 57 (a mike I see used most often for instruments)
> does not and maybe vice versa?
>
>
>
--
Thanks, Boris Plotnikov
http://borisplotnikov.ru
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.