Re: [Harp-L] Recorders
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Recorders
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:58:45 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=XDuOigetFDEzpQuhcJ731Dj7N6Dd3obSIFxdLOaGA2J+OC/MbnjFkagWR7hx0Sfu; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Aongus Mac Cana" wrote:
<I took the plunge into digital recording a year or two ago when a local
<music store had a special offer on the Zoom H2 Next recorder for 160 Euro.
<(They are normally 200 +)
<
<I reckon that I got my money's worth...
I'm sure you did. The H2 is a very nice device, and in the USA you can get one for about $100. Very nice deal on a basic stereo digital recorder with builtin mics.
The reason I didn't mention the H2 in my discussion of digital recorders is that it fails to meet the original requirements: it can't do multi-tracking.
For live stereo recording the H2 remains the bomb at its price point.
Regards, Richard Hunter
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.