Re:[Harp-L] Re. Diminished Chromatic
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re:[Harp-L] Re. Diminished Chromatic
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:27:56 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=DL6ZGI4zoyHhyu1i4+WUaO1GzzF7AV7HeFhrUqu6J4otRn9nEuxEa6QnAaLOghZD; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Brendan Power" wrote:
<Hi Konstantin: since you have good diatonic bending skills, why not
<half-valve your diminished chromatic? Then you can bend all the draw reeds a
<This gives a lot more expression and what I call 'bend enharmonics': notes
<that are the same as the existing notes but achieved through bends instead.
<This makes for more alternate phrasing options and more flowing lines.
<If you want to try, simply remove the covers and pull off all the outer
<valves (leave the inner ones alone). In addition to the musical benefits, it
<virtually eliminates sticking valves forever, a win-win!
Very interesting stuff. I presume that this approach can be applied to standard-tuned chromatics as well?
Regarding the importance of an airtight mouthpiece: is the Hohner CX-12 a superior choice in this regard?
Finally, regarding embossing the reed slots: is that something to be done for every slot, or only for the slots exposed when valves are removed.
Finally finally, are there any other things that a (very) occasional harp tech should be aware of in order to avoid wrecking a pretty expensive instrument?
Thanks, Richard Hunter
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and