[Harp-L] RE: no standards of harmonica accomplishment

[Chris Reynolds <c_reynolds2571@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'm with Mr. Bee on this one. I don't want to ruffle any feathers but why do we need a standard of accomplishment? I started playing because my Grandpa's played, and I can say with absolute certainty that they never gave a single thought to their level of playing. They played for no other reason than the enjoyment and a lot of people enjoyed listening to them. Same reason a lot of people play whatever instrument they happen to play. So I guess my question is why we need a standard rather than what that standard should be. Does it only apply to certain situations? As someone who's focused on the guitar for 30 years with some long breaks I can tell you I'm no where near the level of those considered guitar greats. Does that mean I shouldn't be allowed to perform? Same with harmonica, piano, bass, etc etc, I'm not great at any of them, but I play for the enjoyment. Do I have to meet a standard before I can enjoy them?

Seems to me that having "standards" would do more to drive a wedge between those who want to see the instrument promoted and those potential players who will start and then maybe not reach those "standards" and give up. I have to say I absolutely love listening to some of you guys play, but whether or not I ever reach that level is of no importance to me. 

 
Chris