Re: [Harp-L] RE: Riff Versus Lick
- To: "harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx" <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] RE: Riff Versus Lick
- From: Christopher Sprankle <crsprankle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 05:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1401969686; bh=9mLlOIhZgD6N74ufryLFsO4jcRs/hiZWV+YPYqshGXw=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=F6L05AVpfxTnO5q1jZepZbIsn9MnSsAnC53IHyRuy71rOcRzvWCn4C6ZgWQHgqAkR++vRbBte22BaYcViq6ULjqgtjC95oSyRv1fkxv4kzqQjZ92Huy1elBbb08BQZTBxyXuL0qOwX/98ZMhMD/QDUXbs5Qqq6iK6DRtr5UuWEQ=
- In-reply-to: <CACqeu8FNOxh3FCQRfmbDXs1r1ioKSNnScjbcjev024yJGHEPyQ@mail.gmail.com>
The Juke riff is actually an arpeggiated E6. The fourth note is a 5 blow not 5 draw. C# not D. I also think the riff works better starting on the 3 blow instead of the 2 draw, but that's just how I play it.
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 6/4/14, Dan Hazen <bluesmandan76@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Subject: [Harp-L] RE: Riff Versus Lick
To: "harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx" <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2014, 12:34 PM
All riffs are licks, but not all
licks are riffs. Its about use and context.
Listen to the opening of ZZ Top's La Grange, or listen to
Muddy Waters'
Mannish Boy (I'm a man) or John Lee Hooker's Boom Boom, and
you'll hear the
underlying riff that obviously forms the main chordal
structure of the
song. Lots of rock and blues is riff-based music... even
metal and punk
employ it a lot... heck it's pretty universal across the
board for all
genres, really. The Black Keys is a modern example of a band
that uses
riffs as the main thing for their music (Dan Auerbach is a
pretty good
guitarist). You might think of a riff as a way of
arpeggiating chords using
a repeated pattern and rhythm... instead of strumming chords
you're using
single notes to imply those chords. It is used especially in
"one chord"
songs (parts of songs) because it is musically more
interesting than just
strumming the same chord over and again.
Used in the context of leads or solos, though, it would be
called a lick.
It is not repeated over and over, end on end, but typically
used once along
with a bunch of other licks. A lick is typically thought of
as being very
short... a tiny musical statement in and of itself.
Think of Juke. It starts with a running draw, 2-3-4-5 to
blow 6, blow 6.
That is a lick. It can be ripped out of context and used all
over the place
in just about any blues song you want. BUT in the context of
Juke, it is an
arpeggiated E7 chord (E G# B D E E) that becomes a riff,
because it is
repeated several times to kick off the song and is a very
signature sound,
it identifies that song. You don't need a band playing
behind you and
strumming chords to make it work, you can just play that
riff, all by
yourself, and everybody knows the song you're playing. As
the song develops
though the lead riff is replaced with more meandering lead
work, which is
lick followed by lick followed by lick, etc. So when
you are learning a
long solo, you would typically break it down into isolated
licks (1, 2, or
4 bar segments) learn each individual lick, and then learn
the sequence,
until you have the entire solo down.
When an isolated lick becomes a STRUCTURAL THEME in the
song, rather than
just a "lead lick" or an embellishment, then it is called a
riff.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.