Re: [Harp-L] Re: Changing a reed's length and thickness
- To: harp-L list <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re: Changing a reed's length and thickness
- From: Music Cal <macaroni9999@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:11:31 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Q7gxauVDWJqYDuhEZ9ncX8/3JW6v1G6Wfkj4rCLkyG4=; b=jZyItnjA/fG5MgJrIurBEPO2mKyap92Ec2AK381x/k+vZBbiiK1WQSWPdmGeo1HUsq /yt/bxsGREOWNlrqU8gituVu7lBGzgN3rHVNtve/SwZyJZjdgFWgq9QnJ61MGRnVQQcA uecWlXzfR1CFGhvZ2iZcZ3igJRe/3K6kpnPhu9lnE7rAjfkmkl46ZUWHHbKG/Ee/go6p R3+pqvO50DWtEhwEvck9x3TmRQ9W0oqgT1Zdu5SO5xzQPGUW8SvFEdk1O0VaorGYc1jP HB1jnjtccZ5hZqFPy4RyniZuGlDBUV+390YOq26nq85hzLvo8SYxo31Y1aS0xOIKFDj8 6AVA==
- In-reply-to: <6064EF57-7F71-4316-9783-D6EB5BCB6B9D@fea.net>
- References: <201407061034.s66AYmbC009726@harp-l.com> <8D1699C4D2E7904-B40-1EF3@webmail-vd003.sysops.aol.com> <6064EF57-7F71-4316-9783-D6EB5BCB6B9D@fea.net>
I wonder how much the distribution of overtones will change with example
configuration given by David.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Vern <jevern@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> The pitch of a reed is proportional to the square root of K/M where K is
> its stiffness and M is its mass near the tip. Stiffness K is affected by
> length and thickness near the rivet where it bends. Its responsiveness to
> your breath depends on its stiffness K and its surface area.
>
> If you shorten a reed to move it to a higher & shorter slot, its pitch
> will go up and its responsiveness to your breath will decrease. Then to
> restore the pitch and responsiveness, you will have to remove material near
> the rivet. Within the outline of an optimally-designed reed lie the
> outlines of smaller, higher-pitched reeds. If you know what to remove, you
> can usually sculpt a higher pitched reed from a lower-pitched one.
>
> This will not greatly affect its fatigue life unless you remove the
> material in too localized a part of its length and create a stress
> concentration. Pitch and responsiveness limit the ranges over which you
> can change the geometry. Optimum designs have been determined
> experimentally over the years and any radical departure from them will
> produce disappointing results.
>
> Vern
>
> On Jul 9, 2014, at 7:50 AM, David Pearce <harpdog123@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > I've been testing some different harmonica designs using sydel's
> configured plates and I would like to know what the effect of changing a
> reeds length and thickness would be. Let's say you have a G note for a 2
> hole draw. What would be the effect of moving that G to a 3 hole draw and
> what would be the effect if you moved that G to the 1 hole draw? I would
> think that increasing the reeds thickness by moving the G to hole #3 would
> shorten the reeds life since a thicker and less flexible reed would be
> vibrating vs a thinner and more flexible reed. What would be the effect on
> the reeds tone?
> >
> > David Pearce
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.