Re: [Harp-L] Re: Overdraw overbend overblow
- To: patpowers <patpowers@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re: Overdraw overbend overblow
- From: Jerry Deall <jdeall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:19:56 +0000 (UTC)
- Cc: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1392139197; bh=0Ug8kbNg7U36AU9UO/aT4XxgMzfFnyKmS+J5AjMHL+U=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=tte9gwqIzPnJNA3IDYU+wTm/J+3HUxEhWhWYxihsPMfgr3M5yx8KLxB76I0l60PRH +V8Nq1Rkd5Pe+KUZibPezUj7LtLxfPTl2m19ks/+Vk7PLTLkhNEaD0Yd3IpyODoeMa GOhPtjyatfllWi3jAsIQ9BWSSthwexq2I8AFvDikJaf7aIlo3xACP0Icz9pKnqiBu2 oL90oOE2ii+Uc4bCBRZZENmFYaVxRap8v3VLg8XT+j2ZZjBT/sX7Z3qDk5CdCHA9pZ yuO0Kd/hWAyAF1c7+CqkttaTGyml6x/ExfdhOy6PgH7e44KbxoN8ucGfmQx8Sd3p6y n47caVistrpjQ==
- In-reply-to: <1116919288.29662157.1392132351731.JavaMail.root@ptd.net>
As created by the Dover twins Ben &* Ilene (sorry couldn't resist)
Thanks Jerry,
----- Original Message -----
From: " patpowers " < patpowers @ ptd .net>
To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 8:25:51 AM
Subject: [Harp-L] Re: Overdraw overbend overblow
How about " bendover !" .. ok , maybe not. .. LOL
Sorry just venting my frustrations.
..gotta go get the cat out of the tree again.
Keep harpin !
Pat Powers
----- Original Message -----
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:16:18 +0800
From: Mike Best <mike.d.best@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Harp-L] Re: Overdraw overbend overblow - now upbend
To: BluzeHarp @ aol .com, harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <00cc01cf26f9$2ae003b0$80a00b10$@me.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset =US-ASCII
Well I guess now that you've asked, I don't like the term " upbend ". I think
overblow (holes 1-6) and overdraw (holes 7-10) are fine. But I'm not gonna
argue about it, especially if I'm going to be held responsible for the death
ray...
Cheers
Mike
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.