[Harp-L] Subject: Facebook vs privacy issues
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Subject: Facebook vs privacy issues
- From: EGS1217@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:22:03 -0400 (EDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20140625; t=1408656124; bh=AdEa76kyTXB3UXqgEMqbGS8KrdsIuEXi8TH64QHN5/Q=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nktT5xFPTRIPs2ANlWBb8fRYGvMW2/S2I2rIg4cNsgpFKqN5dAUHgJVYwJl0kIgyB bQG9/0BQU/ESdyPitdbLfEezZtR+QLQH2eVlZwh11tkSO9s9umrELKqZwYPkmVvtcO 2e5ynuG2ewQVi4asXE/FEQeVkM2f5PQ1AgQNDvEk=
For those who might think Facebook is the be all and end all, I beg to
differ.
I first signed up purely to connect with my many harmonica friends.
I'm slowly phasing it out --visiting only rarely to check on those few
people I still interact with MAINLY due to the complete lack of privacy (one
has to use full name and provide other personal info when first signing up).
Other news sites are presently linking any of your on-line posting
(regardless of content) directly to your facebook page whether you agree with this
practice or not. (This is a fairly recent development).
If that's satisfactory to you, fine. I disagree.
Most online music sites allow use of 'nick' names for privacy. Big
difference.
Elizabeth
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.