Re: [Harp-L] blah blah blah discussion

["Robert Laughlin" <harmonicaman1968@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

No problem Joe. It's my fault for trying to be 'funneh', and instead being 
misleading. I shouldn't have used the word "shill". It was too much, though 
in jest. I don't blame anyone except myself.

All I really wanted was to get a handle on what gear people are actually 
using, you know, people's preferences and actual working gig bag. That tends 
to speak louder than mere "advice" at times.

Just the few responses that did mention their gear have been thoroughlly 
rewarding to me, and I thank those who participated. Very enlightening.

Thanks to all.

RL




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joseph Leone" <3n037@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <owner-harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Harp L Harp L" <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] blah blah blah discussion


> I didn't find anything malicious in the original posters query. What I am 
> now seeing is too many people on the defensive. Being too sensitive. 
> Everyone take a deep breath.
>
> smokey-joe
>
> On Apr 13, 2014, at 9:16 PM, owner-harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > This is a very near the edge topic that quickly veered to the edge
> > careening over it and becoming off topic.  If anyone wants to comment on
> > the thread and manage to talk about something related to harmonica go for
> > it.  The other part, the ethical moral behaviour of harmonica endorsers
> > and or the defense of the ethical moral behaviour of harmonica endorsers,
> > I'm calling and end to that .  thanks, harp-l-listowner


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com