[Harp-L] Re: Fender Excelsior
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: Fender Excelsior
- From: BluzeHarp@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 17:23:51 -0400 (EDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1369085031; bh=xvRP/scX7xKA62JpFm5G4CHapFkF5uAVi++esuN0KOA=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZjMvYJaP4xAt5Ci9Zk1xfrAjTyV9RFBz/yHxW+FZkwmhfEqVp01YJd0c/fAf5PaFr pcVmEfOeDNw0oJIZlRt4VCFe0ibguwETA6a9JxkEOsSuO89ennG9I9pVMbzyyB7lX8 mal3xYKZ+aOOG6C2dvjkOVtKU+o5xLYThTJuKNtc=
A microphone client showed up with an Excelsior a few weeks back. I had
hoped it would be a winner, but regardless of control settings or the
various mic's we utilized I thought is was crunchy to the point of being
obnoxious, and that it lacked any of the subtle overtones which typically
characterize a 'good' harp amp. Probably works just fine for some styles of
guitar, but the best harp friendly mod is probably to chuck it under a bus.
I think it would cost more to make it even half right than buying a better
sounding amp to begin with. That said, there will always be more than one
person who likes the sound and who will get a pleasant result, just that
it certainly wasn't my cup of tea. I know that it's inexpensive, and it
might get louder than some other budget minded offerings, but my opinion is
that you'd be better of with a the 6 watt VHT, an Epiphone Valve Jr, or for
a bit more dough one of the older Kalamazoo's which Greg Heumann so nicely
refurbishes.
Perhaps once it's been around for longer and several qualified amp tech's
have taken a stab at it then a modification roadmap will begin to emerge.
If someone eventually manages to wring better tone from one I'd love to
hear some properly recorded before and after clips.
Christopher Richards
Twin Tone Microphones
Harmonicaplanet .com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.